A subset of a space is $k_1$-closed if its intersection with every compact subset is closed in the subset.
A subset of a space is $k_2$-closed if its intersection with every continuous image of a compact Hausdroff space is closed in the image.
A subset of a space is $k_3$-closed if its intersection with every compact Hausdorff subset is closed in the subset.
Say a space is $k_i$-Hausdorff provided its diagonal is $k_i$-closed in the product.
Here we distinguished the difference between $k_1$-Hausdorff and $k_2$-Hausdorff, namely $k_1H\Rightarrow KC\Rightarrow wH\Rightarrow k_2H\Rightarrow US$ with no arrows reversing.
It's immediate that $k_2H\Rightarrow k_3H$. Does this arrow reverse? Does $k_3H\Rightarrow US$? If so, does that arrow reverse?
Not every $k_3$-Hausdorff space is $T_0$.
Let $2=\{0,1\}$ have the non-$T_0$ indiscrete topology. The compact Hausdorff subspaces of $2^2$ are singletons, so all sets are $k_3$-closed.
Not every $T_0+k_3$-Hausdorff space is $T_1$.
Let $2=\{0,1\}$ have the $T_0$-not-$T_1$ Sierpinski topology. The compact Hausdorff subspaces of $2^2$ are singletons and $\{(0,1),(1,0)\}$. It follows that the diagonal's intersection with each compact Hausdorff subspace is empty or the whole subspace, so it is $k_3$-closed.
In particular, $k_3H$ certainly does not imply $US$, but perhaps $k_3H+T_1$ implies $US$?