Let $M$ be a Kähler manifold with fundamental form $\omega(X,Y) = h(JX, Y)$. I am trying to show that $\omega$ is harmonic. The Kähler condition implies that $\omega$ is closed with respect to $d$, so it suffices to show that $\delta \omega = *d*\omega = 0$. However, I have been unable to do so. Any suggestions?
2026-03-27 09:57:08.1774605428
Kähler form is harmonic
2.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in COMPLEX-GEOMETRY
- Numerable basis of holomporphic functions on a Torus
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Hausdorff Distance Between Projective Varieties
- What can the disk conformally cover?
- Some questions on the tangent bundle of manifolds
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Reason for Graphing Complex Numbers
- Why is the quintic in $\mathbb{CP}^4$ simply connected?
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
Related Questions in KAHLER-MANIFOLDS
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- Equality of $C^\infty$-functions on a complex manifold
- A compact Kähler manifold X with $H^{1,1}(X; \mathbb Z)=0$ cannot be embedded in a projective space?
- Picard group of a Torus
- à la Shafarevich conjecture for the moduli space of Calabi-Yau manifolds
- Difference of cohomologous Kähler forms
- What are the challenges and the importance to build an explicit K3 metric?
- Relative Hitchin-Kobayashi correspondence and relative Hermitian Yang-Mills connections
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Choose a local orthonormal frame $X_1, Y_1, ..., X_m, Y_m$ such that $J(X_i) = Y_i$ and denote by $(\alpha_1, \beta_1, ..., \alpha_m, \beta_m)$ the dual frame ($\alpha_i = X_i^{\flat}, \beta_i = Y_i^{\flat})$. In such a frame, $\omega$ is given by $\omega = \sum \alpha_i \wedge \beta_i$. The orthonormal frame $(X_1, Y_1, ..., X_m, Y_m)$ is positively oriented and so $(\alpha_1, \beta_1, ..., \alpha_m, \beta_m)$ is positively oriented frame of covectors with respect the induced orientation on $T^{*}M$. Hence, it is easy to describe how the Hodge star acts on $k$-forms which are wedge products of members of the frame.
For $\alpha_i \wedge \beta_i$, we have $$ *(\alpha_i \wedge \beta_i) = \pm \alpha_1 \wedge \beta_1 \wedge \ldots \hat{\alpha_i} \wedge \hat{\beta_i} \ldots \wedge \alpha_m \wedge \beta_m, $$ where the sign is determined by orientation of the basis $$ (\alpha_i, \beta_i, \alpha_1, \beta_1, \ldots, \alpha_m, \beta_m). $$ Since this is also positively oriented, the sign is $+1$ and $$ *\omega = \sum \alpha_1 \wedge \beta_1 \wedge \ldots \hat{\alpha_i} \wedge \hat{\beta_i} \ldots \wedge \alpha_m \wedge \beta_m = \frac{1}{(m-1)!} \omega^{m-1}. $$
This immediately implies that $*\omega$ is closed and so $\omega$ is co-closed and harmonic.