How do I know where I would be using factoring as opposed to rational zero theorem? Do I use Descartes rule of signs to get how many positive/negative roots are and then attempt RZT to get rational zeroes, then if the amounts do not match up, try factoring it?
On top of that, how do I know whether to complete the square or "factor it out" (is there an easy way to do this for non-$(x+a)(x+b)$-esque ones?)? IIRC, the quadratic formula is used only for $ax^2+bx+c$-type where maximum degree is $2$. Should I factor degrees greater than $2$ into some kind of $(x+a)(ax^2+bx+c)$ and then attempt the quadratic equation if its degree is higher than $2$?
Thanks, much appreciated
Factoring and the rational root theorem are both good when they work, and work on some problems the other doesn't. You just try both. The quadratic formula and completing the square just work for quadratic equations-when the highest power of $x$ is $x^2$. There are analogous formulas for cubic and quartic equations, but they get much messier.