$L= \mathbb{Q}( \sqrt 2, \sqrt 3)$ is normal extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ or not?
I noted that $L= \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt 2+\sqrt 3)$ using tower law. $[L:\mathbb{Q}]=4\ne 2$ so can't conclude from 'quadratic extensions are normal'. Suppose that the extension is normal. Then Irr($\sqrt 2+\sqrt 3)=p(x)$ must split in $L$. $p(x)=(x^2-2)^2-24$. So L must contain splitting field of $p$ over $\mathbb{Q}$, which is just $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt 2+\sqrt 3)$. But this does not give me a contradiction.
So it seems that the extension is normal. To prove this: Take $a\in L$. Consider $q(x)= Irr (a, \mathbb{Q})$. It must be shown that $q$ splits in $L$. But I am not sure how to show this.
Edit: (added by Kenny, see comments).
The OP is using this definition for a normal extension.
An algebraic extension $K/F$ is normal iff for every $k$ in $K$, $irr (k, F)$ splits in $K$.
This is equivalent to the following:
For every irreducible polynomial $p(x)$ in $F[x]$ with a root in $K$, $p(x)$ splits in $K$.
At the present moment, this is the only definition the OP is aware of. The OP is specifically looking for an argument that starts from this definition.
As discussed in the comments, there are several equivalent definitions of what it means for a finite field extension $L : F$ to be normal.
As I understand it, you are familiar only with Definition 2.
However, the problem is much easier to solve if we work with Definition 1. Indeed, as @TheSilverDoe points out, your $L$ is the splitting field of the polynomial $(x^2 - 2)(x^2 - 3) \in \mathbb Q[x]$.
So how do we prove that Definition 1 implies Definition 2?
Let's suppose that $L$ is the splitting field of some $f(x) \in F[x]$. Let $p(x) \in F[x]$ be an irreducible polynomial with a root $a \in L$. We want to prove that $p(x)$ splits completely over $L$.
I think the cleanest approach is to start by constructing a field $K$ such that (i) $L \subset K$ and (ii) $p(x)$ splits completely in $K$. (For example, we could take $K$ to be the splitting field of $p(x)$ over $L$.)
Let $b$ be some root of $p(x)$ in $K$. Our goal is to prove that $b$ is in fact in $L$.
At this point, we should draw a diagram, showing various important subfields of $K$ and the relationships between them.
Now we can make a few observations.
Observation 1: $[F(a) : F] = [F(b) : F]$.
To see this, note that $a$ and $b$ are both roots of the irreducible polynomial $p(x) \in F[x]$.
Therefore, there exists an isomorphism $g : F(a) \to F(b)$ that sends $a \mapsto b$ and fixes elements of $F$.
The claim that $[F(a) : F] = [F(b) : F]$ follows.
Observation 2: $[L(a) : F(a)] = [L(b) : F(b)]$.
To see this, observe that $L(a)$ is the splitting field of $f(x)$ over $F(a)$, and $L(b)$ is the splitting field of $f(x)$ over $F(b)$.
The isomorphism $g : F(a) \to F(b)$ induces an isomorphism $\hat g : F(a)[x] \to F(b)[x]$. Since $g$ fixes elements of $F$, and the polynomial $f$ has all of its coefficients in $F$, we have that $\hat g(f) = f$. Thus:
Therefore, by the uniqueness theorem for splitting fields, $g$ extends to an isomorphism $\widetilde g : L(a) \to L(b)$. The claim that $[L(a) : F(a)] = [L(b) : F(b)]$ follows immediately.
Observation 3: $[L(a) : L] = 1$.
This is trivial, since $a$ is in $L$ by assumption.
Anyway, using our three observations together with the tower law, we can see that \begin{multline} [L(b) : L] = \frac{[L(b) : F]}{[L:F]} = \frac{[L(b) : F(b)] [F(b) : F]}{[L:F]} \\ = \frac{[L(a) : F(a)] [F(a) : F]}{[L:F]} = \frac{[L(a) : F]}{[L:F]} = [L(a) : L] = 1.\end{multline}
This proves that $b$ is in $L$.