My discrete mathematics lecture notes give the following definition of a lattice order:
A 'Partial order R is a lattice order if the set of lower bounds for any two elements $x, y ∈ X$ has the maximum element and the set of upper bounds for any two elements $x, y ∈ X$ has the minimum element.'
I assumed that $x, y$ must be distinct, especially after having looked at the following definition of a lattice-ordered set and noted that a set is a collection of distinct objects. However, my lecturer holds to his claim that the elements $x, y$ above do not have to be distinct.
Is this possible - i.e., is it possible for $x, y$ in the definition above to be the same?
Really the thing here to notice is that $x\wedge x=x$ and $x\vee x=x$:
Certainly $x$ is less than or equal to $x$ and so is a lower bound of $\{x\}$. Moreover, if $x<y<x$, we reach a contradiction. Thus, $x$ is the \emph{greatest} lower bound of $\{x\}$. Thus, $x\wedge x=\inf\{x,x\}=x$
Analogous reasoning shows that $x$ is the least upper bound of $\{x\}$. Thus, $x\vee x=\sup\{x,x\}=x$.