I am trying to find a simplification of the following, preferably to a hypergeometric function. I have the result in Mathematica notation:
HarmonicNumber[1 + k] + (-1)^k LerchPhi[-1, 1, 2 + k] + Log[2]
which I think means the following (not sure about the Lerch transcendent): $$H_{k+1} + (-1)^{k} \Phi (-1, 1, k+2) + \ln(2)$$
I feel like it should be possible to simplify, because evaluating LerchPhi[-1, 1, 2 + k] for different values of k yields results that contain a $(-1)^{k} \ln(2)$ term.
The reason why I think it should be in terms of a hypergeometric functions, is that I managed to derive analogous results to this one in terms of the pFq fn.
Edit: $k \geq 0$ here.
Any ideas?
There is a subtle issue with Wolfram's
LerchPhi, but for $\Re(2+k) > 0$ it is the same as the standard definition, see (1). So if $\Re(2+k) > 0 $ you get from (2) $$\Phi(-1, 1, k+2) = \frac{1}{k+2}\, {_2}F_1(1,k+2, k+3, -1).$$According to Maple the RHS can be written in terms of the digamma function
$$\Phi(-1, 1, k+2) =\frac{1}{2}\Psi\left(\frac{3}{2}+\frac{1}{2}k\right)-\frac{1}{2}\Psi\left(1+ \frac{1}{2}k\right),$$ which may be used together with $H_{k+1} = \Psi(k+2) + \gamma.$
Or you can use a linear transformation 15.3.4 from Abramowitz/Stegun $$\frac{1}{k+2}\, {_2}F_1(1,k+2, k+3, -1) =\frac{1}{2(k+2)}\, {_2}F_1(1,1, k+3, \tfrac{1}{2})$$