When I was looking for info on converting latitude/longitude to $(x,y)$ Cartesian coordinates, I found this link on Doctor Math.
I found this following formula:
In Radians: $$x = (\text{lon}_2 - \text{lon}_1)\times \cos(\text{lat}_1)\times \frac{\pi}{180}$$ $$y = (\text{lat}_2-\text{lat}_1)\times \frac{\pi}{180}$$
In miles: $$x = (\text{lon}_2-\text{lon}_1)\times \cos(\text{lat}_1)\times \frac{\pi \times R}{180}$$ $$y = (\text{lat}_2-\text{lat}_1)\times \frac{\pi\times R}{180}$$
And :
$$\text{lat}_2 = \text{lat}_1 + y\times \frac{180}{\pi\times R}$$ $$\text{lon}_2 = \text{lon}_1 + x\times \frac{180}{\pi\times R\times \cos(\text{lat}_1)}$$
The Question:
Why converting to radian or degree for finding x,y?
Are there any references that explain the previous conversion formula?
Thank you :)
Information from source linked by the OP:
I think you misunderstood/mistyped the formulas given in the link you provided in your question, as posted. The use of R (radius) and $\frac {\pi}{180}$ in the equation gives the representation of x and y in the units in which radius $R$ is measured. (As Isaac notes in his comment: latitude and longitude are expressed in degrees, and to get the correct corresponding x and y coordinate, we must convert from degrees. I'm no sure why you added formulas for "in radians", for this is not in the source you linked.
As for references:
For some literature providing a more in-depth explanation on converting geodesic coordinates to Cartesian coordinates, and the other way around see: geodetic $\iff$ cartesion, pdf.
For converting Cartesian coordinates to Geodetic (e.g. latitude, longitude), see also cartesian to geodetic, pdf.
For an on-line conversion tool (i.e., converts geodetic $\iff$ cartesian) coordinates, see: online conversion tool. It can convert to and from any number of geodetic representations. (See conversion tool, linked above, for menu choices.)