I have tried to assert that $\ln(x)=O(x^0)$ a few times, but it seems fairly obvious that this statement should be false, and so I've been faced with some rightful speculation.
My reason is that
$$\ln(x)=\lim_{k\to0}\frac{x^k-1}{k}=O(x^0)?$$
But if not, then I ask
What is the smallest value of $k$ for $\ln(x)=O(x^k)?$ A proof would be nice, and possibly some cleanuping if my notation is used incorrectly.
The first point is: when you use asymptotic notations, you need to specify with regard to what point the asymptotics is taken. Here, it looks like this is when $x\to 0^+$; note that this could have equally been $x\to\infty$, so specifying it is required.
Now, you have that for any fixed $\alpha > 0$, $$ \ln x = O(x^{-\alpha}) $$ when $x\to 0^+$, since $\left\lvert x^\alpha \ln x\right\rvert\xrightarrow[x\to0^+]{} 0$. Yet, this does not "go to the limit": there is no minimum $\alpha\geq 0$ for which this holds.
Parenthesis: you have $\ln x = x^{\frac{\ln\ln x}{\ln x}}$, so you could technically write $\ln x = \Theta(x^{\frac{\ln\ln x}{\ln x}})$... but note that this means "taking $\alpha = \alpha(x) = \frac{\ln\ln x}{\ln x}$."