Local ring and zero divisors

1.4k Views Asked by At

Let $(R,\mathfrak m)$ be a Noetherian local ring. Suppose that all $x$ belonging to $\mathfrak m-\mathfrak m^2$ are zero divisors. Show that all elements of $\mathfrak m$ are zero divisors.

My progress:

My idea is to see that the set of zero divisors is equal to the union of the associated primes of the ideal zero, obtained from the minimal primary decomposition of the ideal zero.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

I think it's useful to promote my comments on Pete Clark's answer to a new answer.

We know that the set of zero divisors of $R$ is equal to the union of the associated primes of $R$. Moreover, the set $\operatorname{Ass}(R)$ of associated primes is finite. We have $$\mathfrak m=\mathfrak m^2\cup(\mathfrak m-\mathfrak m^2)\subseteq\mathfrak m^2\cup\bigcup_{\mathfrak p\in\operatorname{Ass}(R)}\mathfrak p.$$ From prime avoidance lemma we learn that $\mathfrak m$ is contained in one of the ideals of the union, so $\mathfrak m\subseteq\mathfrak m^2$ or $\mathfrak m\subseteq\mathfrak p$ for some $\mathfrak p\in\operatorname{Ass}(R)$.
In the first case $\mathfrak m=0$ by Nakayama, and this is a contradiction with the hypothesis which tacitly assumes $\mathfrak m\ne\mathfrak m^2$.
In the second case we get $\mathfrak m\in\operatorname{Ass}(R)$, and therefore there is a nonzero element $x$ of $R$ with $x\mathfrak m=0$, so $\mathfrak m$ consists of zerodivisors, and we are done.

11
On

In fact, under the given hypothesis there is a nonzero element $x$ of $R$ with $x \mathfrak{m} = \{0\}$. This is proved in Lemma 5.85 of T.Y. Lam's GTM Lectures on Modules and Rings. Lam's proof is reproduced in Corollary 10.8 of these notes.