I have found the following alternative definition of limit of a real function $f \in \mathbb{R}^T$, with $T \subseteq \mathbb{R}$.
Definition: If $x$ is an extended real number which is the limit of at least one sequence in $T\setminus\{x\}$, we say that $y$ is the limit of $f$ at $x$, and write $$\lim_{t \to x} f(t) = y,$$ provided that $f(x_m) \to y$ for every sequence $(x_m)$ in $T\setminus\{x\}$ with $x_m \to x$.
I have some problems concerning it.
- Why is it actually equivalent to the standard $\varepsilon - \delta$ definition?
- Don't we lose something by focusing on sequences (defined on $\mathbb{N}$, while the domain here is $\mathbb{R}$)?
As always, any feedback is most welcome.
Thank you for your time.
Answering $1$ and $2$ simultaneously:
It is equivalent due to the fact that $\overline{\mathbb{R}}$ is first countable: that is, for every point $x$ there exists a countable local basis. You can find more info on definitions here. Note that this is valid for an arbitrary metric space. However, the definition you state is not equivalent in general topological spaces. You can, however, solve this issue by using nets instead of sequences to characterize continuity.