Which books, say Lee's Introduction to Smooth Manifolds or Munkres' Analysis on Manifolds explains how the theory of a differentiable manifolds can be used to solve a problem that is expressed in a spherical coordinate system? Such a problem could be calculation of volume of a sphere, or Maxwell speed distribution summing over all directions, while using manifolds. Do any of the books listed provide such an explanation?
2026-03-28 14:53:46.1774709626
Manifolds, coordinate systems, books
419 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in COORDINATE-SYSTEMS
- How to change a rectangle's area based on it's 4 coordinates?
- How to find 2 points in line?
- Am I right or wrong in this absolute value?
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- inhomogeneous coordinates to homogeneous coordinates
- Find the distance of the point $(7,1)$ from the line $3x+4y=4$ measured parallel to the line $3x-5y+2=0.$
- A Problem Based on Ellipse
- Convert a vector in Lambert Conformal Conical Projection to Cartesian
- Archimedean spiral in cartesian coordinates
- How to find the area of the square $|ABCD|$?
Related Questions in BOOK-RECOMMENDATION
- Books recommendations for a second lecture in functional analysis
- Book/Online Video Lectures/Notes Recommendation for Analysis(topics mentioned)
- Are there any analysis textbooks like Charles Pinter's A book of abstract algebra?
- Calculus book suggestion
- How to use the AOPS books?
- What are good books cover these topics?
- Book Recommendation: Introduction to probability theory (including stochastic processes)
- calculus of variations with double integral textbook?
- Probability that two random numbers have a Sørensen-Dice coefficient over a given threshold
- Algebraic geometry and algebraic topology used in string theory
Related Questions in SPHERICAL-COORDINATES
- Volume between a sphere and a cone
- Trilaterating 2D cartesian coordinates, without Z
- Divergence in Spherical & Cylindrical Polar co-ordinates derivation
- Spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates with arbitrary origin for spherical coordinate system
- Triple integral. Spherical coordinates. Too much calculations
- Finding the kernel of a linear map gotten from a linear map with one kind of bessel function $j_i$ and replacing them with the $y_j$
- Distribution of correlation of fixed vector on vectors of n-sphere
- Calculate $\int_{\mathbb R^3} x_3^2 e^{-\lVert x \rVert _2} \lambda_3(dx)$
- Magnitude of a Vector in Spherical Coordinates with No Radial Component
- Rotate the surface of a sphere using altitude
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Spherical coordinates are native to $R^3$ and cannot directly be generalized to higher dimensional spaces. If you look at how this coordinate system is defined, you'll see that it relies intimately on the local geometry of three dimensional Euclidean space.
Now there are certainly higher dimensional manifolds that are locally homeomorphic in their three-dimensional subspaces to $R^3$ under spherical coordinates, but this then requires the construction of not only an appropriate family of functions to define the coordinate system, but the local subspace itself where this coordinate system is valid. Tensors are usually needed to make this constructions precise. This is why many differential geometers outside of physics work in a coordinate-free manner via differential forms,looking at the "big picture" on the manifold rather then specific coordinate systems. Of course, this doesn't make coordinate systems any less important on manifolds -- particularly in modern mechanics.
Now comes the sales-pitch:
I would recommend $1$ specific book in particular for you to begin to study coordinate systems on abstract manifolds and it's relatively cheap. The book is Differential Topology: An Introduction by David Gauld. This is a strange, almost unknown textbook Dover unearthed -- it was first published 30 years ago and went out of print almost as fast.
It's an introduction to smooth manifolds aimed at sophisticated undergraduates. It’s prerequisites are small: just a rigorous course in one variable analysis using $\epsilon$-$\delta$ arguments.
The book has a lot of good pictures, mostly careful rigor and explains many things very well-it also has a lot of nice exercises, none too hard. The book’s real strength -- something no other introductory book on differential manifolds do, to my knowledge -- is the hundreds of specific examples of local coordinate systems as differentiable structures via charts and the very precise formulation of orientability on these structures in Euclidean space. No book does this comprehensive a job of giving examples of these 2 critical concepts and for that reason alone, the book is worth having.
The main problem with the book is that Gauld tends to lapse into idiosyncrasies of language that make the book very confusing at times -- and it’s jarring given what a good job he does with the rest of the book. The main example of this is in the opening 3 chapters which develop the necessary point set topology needed for the book -- and he does it in terms of the old 1970’s paradigm of “nearness” i.e. topological properties are developed entirely from axioms derived from the properties of limit points. For students with either minimal backgrounds in topology or those that have been trained in the “usual” formulation of topology, these chapters may be utterly baffling. Fortunately -- this material plays no role in most of the rest of the book, it’s merely so that differentiable manifolds can be defined precisely.
He also does a good job explaining surgery on low dimensional manifolds, a better job then most books do. Unfortunately, he also does a sloppy job of using it to prove the classification theorem of surfaces, with a lot of handwaving.
That being said -- most of his presentation is excellent and very useful and at this price, you really can’t complain too much.That book should help answer a lot of your questions.