In a paper, I came along the map $\mu \colon \mathbb{R}P^{\infty} \times \mathbb{R} P^{\infty} \to \mathbb{R} P^{\infty}$ which is the map that represents tensor product of line bundles. Does anybody know what exactly does this means?
2026-03-26 12:58:25.1774529905
Map that represents tensor product of line bundles
158 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Related Questions in LINE-BUNDLES
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Picard group of a fibration
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- Understanding line bundles on $\mathbb{P}_k^1$ using transition functions
- Very ample line bundle on a projective curve
- Local computation of the curvature form of a line bundle
- $P$ is a branching point of the elliptic curve $(E, P)$
- Why does a globally generated invertible sheaf admit a global section not vanishing on any irreducible component?
- Global section $s$ of ample line bundle such that $X_s$ is everywhere dense
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There is a categorical way to establish the existence of a map representing tensor product, but there is also a classifying space approach. Since the story is the same for arbitrary rank bundles, I will address the general case. Finally, I will specialise to the case of line bundles and give an explicit map.
Categorical Approach
Let $\operatorname{Vect}_k(X)$ denote the set of isomorphism classes of real rank $k$ vector bundles over a paracompact space $X$ (e.g. a CW complex). This set can be identified with homotopy classes of maps $X \to BO(m)$, i.e. $[X, BO(m)]$. In the language of category theory, the association $X \to \operatorname{Vect}_k(X)$ is a functor from a category (the full subcategory of $\mathsf{hTop}$ whose objects are homotopy classes of paracompact spaces) to $\mathsf{Set}$. Note that $[X, BO(k)] = \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(X, BO(k))$, so the functor $X \to \operatorname{Vect}_k(X)$ is a hom-functor.
Likewise, the functor $X \mapsto \operatorname{Vect}_m(X)\times\operatorname{Vect}_n(X)$ is a hom-functor as $\operatorname{Vect}_m(X)\times\operatorname{Vect}_n(X)$ can be identified with $[X, BO(m)]\times[X, BO(n)]$, and in turn, $[X, BO(m)\times BO(n)]$.
The map $\operatorname{Vect}_m(X)\times \operatorname{Vect}_n(X) \to \operatorname{Vect}_{mn}(X)$ given by $(E, F) \mapsto E\otimes F$ can then be viewed as a natural transformation between two functors. As both functors are hom-functors, the Yoneda lemma states that the natural transformation is induced by an element of
$$\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(BO(m)\times BO(n), BO(mn)) = [BO(m)\times BO(n), BO(mn)].$$
That is, a map $\mu : BO(m)\times BO(n) \to BO(mn)$, well-defined up to homotopy. To be precise, the map $[X, BO(m)\times BO(n)] \to [X, BO(mn)]$ is given by $(f, g) \mapsto \mu\circ(f, g)$.
Explicit Construction
Let $\gamma^d$ denote the tautological real rank $d$ vector bundle over $BO(k)$.
The map $\mu : BO(m)\times BO(n) \to BO(mn)$ is precisely a classifying map for the bundle $\pi_1^*\gamma^m\otimes\pi_2^*\gamma^n$ where $\pi_1 : BO(m)\times BO(n) \to BO(m)$ and $\pi_2 : BO(m)\times BO(n) \to BO(n)$ are the natural projections.
To see this, let $E \to X$ and $F \to X$ be real vector bundles of rank $m$ and $n$ respectively over a paracompact space $X$, and let $f$ and $g$ be classifying maps for $E$ and $F$ respectively. Then $(f, g) \in [X, BO(m)\times BO(n)]$ corresponds to the pair $(E, F)$, and $\mu\circ(f, g) \in [X, BO(mn)]$ corresponds to
\begin{align*} (\mu\circ(f, g))^*\gamma^{mn} &\cong (f, g)^*\mu^*\gamma^{mn}\\ &\cong (f, g)^*(\pi_1^*\gamma^m\otimes\pi_2^*\gamma^n)\\ &\cong ((f, g)^*\pi_1^*\gamma^m)\otimes((f,g)^*\pi_2^*\gamma^n)\\ &\cong (\pi_1\circ(f, g))^*\gamma^m\otimes(\pi_2\circ(f, g))^*\gamma^n\\ &\cong f^*\gamma^m\otimes g^*\gamma^n\\ &\cong E\otimes F. \end{align*}
Line Bundles
When $m = n = 1$, we have $BO(1) = B\mathbb{Z}_2 = \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}$, so the map representing the tensor product of line bundles is a map $\mu : \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\times\mathbb{RP}^{\infty} \to \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}$. I claim that we can take $\mu$ to be the infinite Segre embedding $$\mu([x_0, x_1, x_2, \dots ], [y_0, y_1, y_2, \dots]) = [x_0y_0, x_1y_0, x_0y_1, x_2y_0, x_1y_1, x_0y_2, \dots].$$ To see this, we need to demonstrate that $\mu^*\gamma \cong \pi_1^*\gamma\otimes\pi_2^*\gamma$ where $\gamma := \gamma^1$ is the tautological line bundle on $\mathbb{RP}^{\infty}$. This will follow from the fact that for the usual Segre embedding $\sigma : \mathbb{RP}^n\times\mathbb{RP}^m \to \mathbb{RP}^N$, where $N = (n+1)(m+1)-1$, we have $\sigma^*\gamma_N \cong p_1^*\gamma_n\otimes p_2^*\gamma_m$ where $\gamma_d$ denotes the tautological line bundle over $\mathbb{RP}^d$, and $p_i$ is projection onto the $i^{\text{th}}$ factor.
Lemma $1$: Let $d < D$. Any linear embedding $\mathbb{RP}^d \to \mathbb{RP}^D$ is homotopic to the standard embedding $[x_0, \dots, x_d] \mapsto [x_0, \dots, x_d, 0, \dots, 0]$.
Proof: Any linear embedding $f : \mathbb{RP}^d \to \mathbb{RP}^D$ is the projectivisation of an injective linear map $L : \mathbb{R}^{d+1} \to \mathbb{R}^{D+1}$. For $i = 0, 1, \dots, d$, set $v_i = L(e_i)$. Extend $\{v_0, \dots, v_d\}$ to a basis $\{v_0, \dots, v_d, v_{d+1}, \dots, v_D\}$ and let $A$ be the unique linear map $\mathbb{R}^{D+1} \to \mathbb{R}^{D+1}$ with $A(v_i) = e_i$. By first negating $v_D$ if necessary, we can arrange for $A$ to have positive determinant. As $GL^+(D+1, \mathbb{R})$ is path-connected, we can find a path $p : [0, 1] \to GL^+(D+1, \mathbb{R})$ with $p(0) = I$ and $p(1) = A$. Then $p(t)\circ L$ is a homotopy through injective linear maps $\mathbb{R}^{d+1} \to \mathbb{R}^{D+1}$ from $L$ to $L' := A\circ L$ which satisfies $L'(e_i) = (A\circ L)(e_i) = A(L(e_i)) = A(v_i) = e_i$, i.e. the standard embedding $\mathbb{R}^{d+1} \to \mathbb{R}^{D+1}$, $(x_0, \dots, x_d) \mapsto (x_0, \dots, x_d, 0, \dots, 0)$. Projectivising this homotopy gives a homotopy between $f$ and the standard embedding $\mathbb{RP}^d \to \mathbb{RP}^D$. $\square$
Lemma $2$: Fix $(x_0, y_0) \in X\times Y$ and consider the maps $j_1 : X \to X\times Y$ given by $x \mapsto (x, y_0)$ and $j_2 : Y \to X\times Y$ given by $y \mapsto (x_0, y)$. Then for any line bundle $L \to X\times Y$ we have $L \cong p_1^*j_1^*L\otimes p_2^*j_2^*L$ where $p_1 : X\times Y \to X$ and $p_2 : X\times Y \to Y$ are the projection maps.
Proof: As is the case for every line bundle on $X\times Y$, we have $L \cong p_1^*L_X\otimes p_2^*L_Y$ for some line bundles $L_X \to X$ and $L_Y \to Y$. As $p_1\circ j_1 = \operatorname{id}_X$ and $p_2\circ j_1$ is the constant map $c : X \to Y$ with value $y_0$, we see that
\begin{align*} j_1^*L &\cong j_1^*(p_1^*L_X\otimes p_2^*L_Y)\\ &\cong j_1^*p_1^*L_X\otimes j_1^*p_2^*L_Y\\ &\cong (p_1\circ j_1)^*L_X\otimes(p_2\circ j_1)^*L_Y\\ &\cong \operatorname{id}_X^*L_X\otimes c^*L_Y\\ &\cong L_X\otimes\varepsilon^1\\ &\cong L_X. \end{align*}
A similar computation shows that $j_2^*L \cong L_Y$, so $L \cong p_1^*L_X\otimes p_2^*L_Y \cong p_1^*j_1^*L\otimes p_2^*j_2^*L$. $\square$
Proposition: Let $\sigma : \mathbb{RP}^n\times\mathbb{RP}^m \to \mathbb{RP}^N$ be the Segre embedding. Then $\sigma^*\gamma_N \cong p_1^*\gamma_n\otimes p_2^*\gamma_m$.
Proof: Let $j_1: \mathbb{RP}^n \to \mathbb{RP}^n\times\mathbb{RP}^m$ be the map given by $x \mapsto (x, [1,0,\dots,0])$. Note that $\sigma\circ j_1$ is a linear embedding $\mathbb{RP}^n \to \mathbb{RP}^N$ and is therefore homotopic to the standard one by Lemma $1$, so $(\sigma\circ j_1)^*\gamma_N \cong \gamma_n$. On the other hand $(\sigma\circ j_1)^*\gamma_N \cong j_1^*\sigma^*\gamma_N$, so $j_1^*\sigma^*\gamma_N \cong \gamma_n$. Similarly, if $j_2 : \mathbb{RP}^m \to\mathbb{RP}^n\times\mathbb{RP}^m$ is the map given by $y \mapsto ([1,0,\dots,0], y)$, then by considering $\sigma\circ j_2 : \mathbb{RP}^m \to \mathbb{RP}^N$, we see that $j_2^*\sigma^*\gamma_N \cong \gamma_m$.
By Lemma $2$, we have $\sigma^*\gamma_N \cong p_1^*j_1^*\sigma^*\gamma_N\otimes p_2^*j_2^*\sigma^*\gamma_N \cong p_1^*\gamma_n\otimes p_2^*\gamma_m$. $\square$
Theorem: If $\mu : \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\times\mathbb{RP}^{\infty} \to \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}$ denotes the infinite Segre embedding defined above, then $\mu^*\gamma \cong \pi_1^*\gamma\otimes\pi_2^*\gamma$.
Proof: For every $d \geq 0$, let $i_d$ denote the standard inclusion $\mathbb{RP}^d \hookrightarrow \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}$. There is a commutative diagram
$$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} \mathbb{RP}^n\times\mathbb{RP}^m @>{(i_n\circ p_1, i_m\circ p_2)}>> \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\times\mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\\ @V{\sigma}VV @VV{\mu}V \\ \mathbb{RP}^N @>{i_N}>> \mathbb{RP}^{\infty} \end{CD}$$
so
\begin{align*} (i_n\circ p_1, i_m\circ p_2)^*\mu^*\gamma &\cong (\mu\circ(i_n\circ p_1, i_m\circ p_2))^*\gamma\\ &= (i_N\circ\sigma)^*\gamma\\ &\cong \sigma^*i_N^*\gamma\\ &\cong \sigma^*\gamma_N\\ &\cong p_1^*\gamma_n\otimes p_2^*\gamma_m. \end{align*}
Now let $J_1 : \mathbb{RP}^{\infty} \to \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\times\mathbb{RP}^{\infty}$ and $J_2 : \mathbb{RP}^{\infty} \to \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\times\mathbb{RP}^{\infty}$ be the maps given by $x \mapsto (x, [1, 0, \dots])$ and $y \mapsto ([1, 0, \dots], y)$ respectively. Then we have commutative diagrams
$$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} \mathbb{RP}^n @>{i_n}>> \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\\ @V{j_1}VV @VV{J_1}V \\ \mathbb{RP}^n\times\mathbb{RP}^m @>{(i_n\circ p_1, i_m\circ p_2)}>> \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\times\mathbb{RP}^{\infty} \end{CD} \qquad \begin{CD} \mathbb{RP}^m @>{i_m}>> \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\\ @V{j_2}VV @VV{J_2}V \\ \mathbb{RP}^n\times\mathbb{RP}^m @>{(i_n\circ p_1, i_m\circ p_2)}>> \mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\times\mathbb{RP}^{\infty}\end{CD} $$
where $j_1$ and $j_2$ are the maps introduced in the proof of the Proposition. Then we have
\begin{align*} i_n^*J_1^*\mu^*\gamma &\cong (J_1\circ i_n)^*\mu^*\gamma\\ &= ((i_n\circ p_1,i_m\circ p_2)\circ j_1)^*\mu^*\gamma\\ &\cong j_1^*(i_n\circ p_1, i_m\circ p_2)^*\mu^*\gamma\\ &\cong j_1^*(p_1^*\gamma_n\otimes p_2^*\gamma_m)\\ &\cong \gamma_n \end{align*}
where the final isomorphism follows from the computation in the proof of the Proposition. As the only line bundles on $\mathbb{RP}^{\infty}$ up to isomorphism are $\varepsilon^1$ and $\gamma$, we see that $J_1^*\mu^*\gamma \cong \gamma$. Likewise, we find that $J_2^*\mu^*\gamma \cong \gamma$. By Lemma $2$, we see that $\mu^*\gamma \cong \pi_1^*J_1^*\mu^*\gamma\otimes\pi_2^*J_2^*\mu^*\gamma \cong \pi_1^*\gamma\otimes\pi_2^*\gamma$. $\square$