Question
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two uniformly distributed random variables with bounds $x_\text{low}$, $x_\text{up}$, $y_\text{low}$ and $y_\text{up}.$ $X$ and $Y$ are correlated with a correlation coefficient of $R$.
Given an observed outcome $x$ from the variable $X$ and given the correlation coefficient $R$, how can one calculate the probability of a particular outcome $y$ from variable $Y$. In other words, how can one calculate
$$P(Y=y \mid X=x, R) = \text{?}$$
Extreme cases
The extreme cases are easy. If $R=0$ ($X$ and $Y$ are independent), then
$$P(Y=y \mid X=x, R) = \frac 1 {Y_\text{up} - Y_\text{low}}$$
If $R = 1$, then
$$P(Y=y \mid X=x, R) = \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if} \space y = \frac{x - x_\text{low}}{x_\text{up} - x_\text{low}} \\ 0, & \text{if} \space y ≠ \frac{x - x_\text{low}}{x_\text{up} - x_\text{low}} \end{cases}$$
Goal
In case it is of interest, my goal when asking this question is to write a short algorithm that sample points from this bivariate uniform distribution with specified correlation coefficient.
if I am guessing correctly (from the comments bewlow your question) you want to simulate something like a "bivariate uniform distribution" and your inspiration arises from the bivariate normal distribution. In my opinion your goal is not (yet) well defined. To make my point clear I will first summarize the bivariate normal distribution.
Bivariate normal distribution A two dimensional random vector $(X, Y)$ is said to have a bivariate normal distribution if its joint pdf is given by ...(see here). If $(X, Y)$ is a bivariate random vector then we can conclude the following:
Why am I telling you something that probably already know? Because the logic from above in general does not translate to other distibutions. McNeil, Frey and Embrechts describe two fallacies in their book quantitative risk management (see here):
They explain more detailed why the results from the normal distribution are in general not valid for other distributions.
So comeing to your question:
So to make your problem better defined you first have to think about a good definition of joint uniform distribution. The correlation $R$ in your case is not enough to do the job.