In a lecture we were investigating graphical methods to check the assumptions of OLS regression. In particular, I was interested by the 'independence of residuals' assumption. After some searching online, I found that having auto-correlation can underestimate or overestimate the least squares estimators. I can't picture this mathematically, and was wondering if it would be possible to shed some light (mathematically) on how this occurs.
2026-03-25 01:16:25.1774401385
Mathematical explanation of how auto-correlation affects least squares estimators
56 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in STATISTICS
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- Statistics based on empirical distribution
- Given $U,V \sim R(0,1)$. Determine covariance between $X = UV$ and $V$
- Fisher information of sufficient statistic
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- KL divergence between two multivariate Bernoulli distribution
- Given random variables $(T_1,T_2)$. Show that $T_1$ and $T_2$ are independent and exponentially distributed if..
- Probability of tossing marbles,covariance
Related Questions in REGRESSION
- How do you calculate the horizontal asymptote for a declining exponential?
- Linear regression where the error is modified
- Statistics - regression, calculating variance
- Why does ANOVA (and related modeling) exist as a separate technique when we have regression?
- Gaussian Processes Regression with multiple input frequencies
- Convergence of linear regression coefficients
- The Linear Regression model is computed well only with uncorrelated variables
- How does the probabilistic interpretation of least squares for linear regression works?
- How to statistically estimate multiple linear coefficients?
- Ridge Regression in Hilbert Space (RKHS)
Related Questions in LINEAR-REGRESSION
- Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) Line Fitting / Regression
- How does the probabilistic interpretation of least squares for linear regression works?
- A question regarding standardized regression coefficient in a regression model with more than one independent variable
- Product of elements of a linear regression
- Covariance of least squares parameter?
- Contradiction in simple linear regression formula
- Prove that a random error and the fitted value of y are independent
- Is this a Generalized Linear Model?
- The expected value of mean sum of square for the simple linear regression
- How to get bias-variance expression on linear regression with p parameters?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For a simple case, assume $X_i \overset{iid}{\sim}N(\mu,1)$, and we are using least squares to estimate $\mu$.
Then $\hat{\mu} = \min_{\mu}\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{(X_i - \mu)^2}{2}$. In this situation all of the observations are equally weighted.
Taking the derivative with respect to $\mu$ and setting equal to 0 gives us:
\begin{equation} \sum_{i=1}^n (-X_i+\mu) = 0 \Rightarrow -\bar{X}+\mu = 0 \Rightarrow \mu = \bar{X} \end{equation}
Consider instead a situation where $\sigma^2_0 = 1$, but $X_i \sim N(\mu,a^{i-1}\sigma^2_0)$; with $a>0$ a known constant. In this setting the residuals are not independent. The least squares estimator in this context is given by:
\begin{equation} \hat{\mu} = \min_{\mu}\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{(X_i - \mu)^2}{2a^{i-1}} \end{equation}
For $a<1$ this is going to magnify the contribution of $(X_i-\mu)^2$ to the minimization problem for later observations, and for $a>1$ diminish the contribution of $(X_i-\mu)^2$ to the minimization problem for later observations.
Consider $X_1 = 1$ and $X_2 = 3$, then $\bar{X} = 2$. However in the situation where $a \neq 1$, the derivative of the least squares problem, set equal to 0, with respect to $\mu$ would be:
\begin{equation} \begin{split} -1 +\mu + \frac{-3+\mu}{a} & = 0\\ \Leftrightarrow \mu & = \frac{a+3}{a+1}\\ \end{split} \end{equation}
Which approaches $3$ as $a \rightarrow 0$ and approaches $1$ as $a \rightarrow \infty$; with equality to the least squares estimate only when $a=1$.
One way to deal with this is to weight the terms in the least squares summation to account for the unequal variances. You can read more about this here.