I have this pay-off matrix above which i try to find its max-min strategies but when i apply the max-min rule pay-offs are equal so i kinda get confused since i am a newbie to game theory. I would be appreciated if you can help me about this.
2026-05-14 08:50:13.1778748613
Max-Min Strategy equal pay-offs
136 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GAME-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Perfect Information Game and Chance node
- Valid operations to the value of a matrix game
- Rook Game Problem Solving
- Proof of Axiom of Transparency in Aumman's model of knowledge
- Sion's MinMax theorem over matrices
- Can Zermelo's theorem be extended to a game which always has a winner?
- a risk lover agent behave as if risk natural.
- How to prove that a strategy profile is a Proper Equilibrium?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

you have:\begin{array}{c|c}1\setminus2&L&R\\\hline L&2,-2&-2, 2\\\hline R&-2, 2&2,-2\end{array} first let's change it to:\begin{array}{c|c}1\setminus2&L&R\\\hline L&2&-2\\\hline R&-2&2\end{array} where the number is the cost from player $(2)$ to player $(1)$
Now let's say that for player $(1)$ there is $(p)$ chance to chose $L$ therefore $(1-p)$ for $R$.
so if $(2)$ plays $L$ $(1)$ gain is: $2p-2(1-p)$
and if $(2)$ plays $R$ $(1)$ gain is: $-2p+2(1-p)$
therefore:$$-2p+2(1-p)=2p-2(1-p)\implies 0=0$$this is probably not what you thought you will get but this actually is the answer, it implies that there is no dominant strategy. i recommend to read a bit here: link
it explain a bit about the meaning behind minimax strategy and have a real nice visualize