I am trying to linearise a model I came up with for this problem:
I have $n$ binary decision variables $x_i$ , each assosiated with a revenue $c_i$.
The profit will be either the weighted average of these : $\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n{x_ic_i}}{\sum_i^n{x_i}}$ or if I chose to keep as 1's , more or equal than 10 of them , the weighted average of the 10 most cheap: $\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n{c_iz_i} }{10}$ where $z_i=1 \iff $ it is in the 10 cheapest.
So one could say that the objective is :
$$maximize \quad \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n{c_iz_i} }{\min(10, \sum_{i=1}^n x_i)}$$
This is definitely not a linear objective.
I was wondering if there is a stanard methodology for such problems. I found in wikipaideia something like ''fraction linear programming" but I have constraints in the form $z_i\leq x_i$ that do not follow the form that's suggested.
2026-03-27 18:07:00.1774634820
Maximising average of decision variables : mixed integer programming
177 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Calculation of distance of a point from a curve
- Find all local maxima and minima of $x^2+y^2$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2y=6$. Does $x^2+y^2$ have a global max/min on the same constraint?
- What does it mean to dualize a constraint in the context of Lagrangian relaxation?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Maximize the function
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
Related Questions in CONVEX-OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) Line Fitting / Regression
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
- Can a linear matrix inequality constraint transform to second-order cone constraint(s)?
- Optimality conditions - necessary vs sufficient
- Minimization of a convex quadratic form
- Prove that the objective function of K-means is non convex
- How to solve a linear program without any given data?
- Distance between a point $x \in \mathbb R^2$ and $x_1^2+x_2^2 \le 4$
Related Questions in NONLINEAR-OPTIMIZATION
- Prove that Newton's Method is invariant under invertible linear transformations
- set points in 2D interval with optimality condition
- Finding a mixture of 1st and 0'th order Markov models that is closest to an empirical distribution
- Sufficient condition for strict minimality in infinite-dimensional spaces
- Weak convergence under linear operators
- Solving special (simple?) system of polynomial equations (only up to second degree)
- Smallest distance to point where objective function value meets a given threshold
- KKT Condition and Global Optimal
- What is the purpose of an oracle in optimization?
- Prove that any Nonlinear program can be written in the form...
Related Questions in MIXED-INTEGER-PROGRAMMING
- Is this statement implying that a binary variable can be between 0 and 1?
- System of Linear Inequalities to create feasible solution $y=\min(x_1,x_2)$
- Ensure (or limit) consecutive presence of variable in MILP
- MILP constraints with truth table
- Is there any mixed integer linear programming module capable of handling integer variables exactly?
- Solve $n * \lceil{\frac{R}{T}}\rceil - \lceil{\frac{R*n}{T} - \frac{x*n}{T}}\rceil = \frac{x * n}{C}$ for x and n, $n \in Z^+$ and $x,R,T,C \in R^+$
- Table formulation in Mixed Integer Programming
- How to optimize for following cost function?
- How to linearize the following constraint? (a summation of a product of a integer with a bounded continuous variable)
- Convert nonlinear constraint to linear constraints for mixed-integer linear programming in MATLAB
Related Questions in LINEARIZATION
- Product and Quotient Rule proof using linearisation
- Finding contstant in remainder term for linearization of $exp(x)$
- Linearizing Logarithmic Function
- Stability of Euler's Method for non-linear ODE
- If $ \|G(x+ty)\|<\|G(x)\| $, is then $ \|G(x) + tG'(x)[y]\| <\|G(x)\| $?
- Newtons method for finding reciprocal
- Properties of matrix $T_\epsilon$ such that there exists a unique inverse for $\epsilon \in (-\delta,\delta)$
- (Checking) derivatives of determinant, cofactor, trace
- How to linearize a weighted average with a decision variable?
- LQR Robotic Arm
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I assume that there is something in the model that might compel you to select more than 10 items even if they do not contribute to the objective function, since otherwise you could just add a constraint limiting you to 10 items. You can do this as a mixed integer linear program using some additional binary binary variables, and assuming you can come up with an a priori upper bound $S$ for your objective function.
For each $x_i$ we introduce a companion binary variable $z_i$ indicating whether it counts toward the objective function. We add the constraints $$z_i \le x_i$$ (don't count it if you didn't pick it) and $$\sum_i z_i \le 10$$ (count at most 10 terms). To enforce the requirement that the selected terms with lowest $c_i$ are the ones counted, define index sets $K_j = \lbrace i : c_i < c_j \rbrace$ and add the constraints $$\sum_{i\in K_j} x_i \le 9 + (\vert K_j\vert - 9 ) \cdot (1 - z_j).$$ If $j$ is not counted in the objective ($z_j = 0$), this has no effect. If $j$ is counted, this prevents selecting more than 9 lower value terms, meaning $j$ is within the 10 lowest value terms selected.
That leaves us with the task of linearizing the objective function. We introduce binary variables $t_1,\dots,t_{10}$ with the constraints $$\sum_{k=1}^{10} t_k = 1$$ and $$\sum_i z_i = t_1 + 2t_2 + \dots + 10t_{10}.$$ The combined effect is that $t_k = 1$ if and only if $k$ items count toward the objective.
Finally, we introduce nonnegative (continuous) variables $u_1,\dots,u_{10}$ and rewrite the objective as maximizing $\sum_k u_k.$ The defining constraints are $$u_k \le S\cdot t_k$$ and $$u_k \le \frac{\sum_i c_i \cdot z_i}{k}.$$ If $k$ items are chosen ($t_k = 1$), the solver will set $u_k = (\sum_i c_i \cdot z_i)/k,$ the average contribution of the selected items. If a different number of items are selected, $t_k = 0 \implies u_k = 0.$