Can we say that $$ \inf_{x \in X}\sup_{y \in Y} f(x,y) = \sup_{y \in Y}\inf_{x \in X} f(x,y)$$ when $X$ and $Y$ are convex subsets of topological vector spaces (potentially infinite dimensional), $f$ is bilinear and continuous, the suprema are always achieved, and the infima are always achieved within a compact set $X_0$? Sion's minimax theorem gives that $$ \inf_{x \in X}\sup_{y \in Y} f(x,y) = \inf_{x \in X_0}\sup_{y \in Y} f(x,y) = \sup_{y \in Y} \inf_{x \in X_0}f(x,y),$$ but I'm not sure if this helps. If my desired statement is false, a counterexample would be much appreciated.
2026-05-16 21:07:05.1778965625
Minimax theorem without compactness
256 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Calculation of distance of a point from a curve
- Find all local maxima and minima of $x^2+y^2$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2y=6$. Does $x^2+y^2$ have a global max/min on the same constraint?
- What does it mean to dualize a constraint in the context of Lagrangian relaxation?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Maximize the function
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
Related Questions in CONVEX-OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) Line Fitting / Regression
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
- Can a linear matrix inequality constraint transform to second-order cone constraint(s)?
- Optimality conditions - necessary vs sufficient
- Minimization of a convex quadratic form
- Prove that the objective function of K-means is non convex
- How to solve a linear program without any given data?
- Distance between a point $x \in \mathbb R^2$ and $x_1^2+x_2^2 \le 4$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Note: in the question as originally asked, $X, Y$ were the full vector spaces, not just convex subsets. This answer addresses that version.
If for some $x$, there is a $y_x$ with $f(x,y_x) \ne 0$, then $f(x,ay_x) = af(x,y_x)$ by bilinearity. By choice of $a$ you can make $f(x,ay_x)$ as high or low as you like. Therefore $\sup_{y \in Y} f(x,y) = \infty$. If no such $y_x$ exists, then obviously $\sup_{y \in Y} f(x,y) = 0$.
Similarly for all $y$, either $\inf_{x\in X} f(x,y) = -\infty$ or $\inf_{x\in X} f(x,y) = 0$
Since $f(0,y) = 0$ for all $y$ and $f(x,0) = 0$ for all $x$, we have $$\inf_{x\in X}\sup_{y\in Y} f(x,y) = 0\\\sup_{y\in Y}\inf_{x\in X} f(x,y) = 0$$ So yes you can say they are the same, but it is actually a trivial statement when $X, Y$ are full vector spaces instead of bounded subsets, and $f$ is fully bilinear instead of convex/concave.