Is Lambert $W(x)$ function, an increasing function from $0\rightarrow\infty$? How about in negative axis and complex plane? Note $W(x)$ is given by $$W(x)e^{W(x)}=x.$$ Charts could help understand.
2026-03-25 12:53:16.1774443196
Montonicity of Lambert W
381 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LAMBERT-W
- Intersection points of $2^x$ and $x^2$
- Solving tetration equation with Lambert W Function
- Solving $x \log(x)$ = $100$.
- Is $x=i²$ the solution of this equation $2018^x+2018x+2018=0 $ in $\mathbb{C}$?
- How to solve $x3^x=18$ algebraically
- ideas on how to prove this statement about the Gram points?
- Solving $n/\ln (n) = 990,000$
- Lambert W function: limits and inverse relation
- Solve $a^x = 1-x$
- Prove that $-\gamma x^2 ( x^{k/\gamma}-1 ) -x^2 + \alpha x - \alpha + 1 \leq 0$ for every $2 \leq x \leq n-1$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
On $[0,\infty)$, it is true that $W(x)$ is a strictly increasing function. This follows from the fact that it is the inverse of a strictly increasing function, $f(x)=x\cdot e^x$ - and the fact that this is increasing is obvious since both $x$ and $e^x$ are. More firmly, from the derivative $f'(x)=(x+1)\cdot e^x$, we can see that $f$ is increasing whenever $x\geq -1$ - which means that $W$ is increasing on the range $[f(-1),\infty)$, or $[\frac{-1}e,\infty)$. This happens to be the entire range for which the $W$ function takes on real values.
The question is not meaningful in the complex plane; there is no notion of order (i.e. is $i>-i$?), so there is no notion of "strictly increasing". So, the only thing we can say is that $W$ is strictly increasing on the domain where it is real (when we choose the principal value of $W$ to be in $[-1,\infty)$).
As was pointed out in comments, since $f$ is decreasing in the interval $(-\infty,1]$, where its image is $(-\frac{1}e,0)$, in this domain there is a branch of $W$ which is strictly decreasing. To plot this, here is the plot of the (multivalued) relation $W$:
The principal branch that I primarily address is in red, and is increasing, as you can see. The other branch is in blue, and is decreasing (towards the vertical asymptote of the $y$-axis).