
An extract from the proof of the existence and uniqueness of the solution of a SDE from Oksendal. I cannot see how holders inequality and the ito isometry are applied.

An extract from the proof of the existence and uniqueness of the solution of a SDE from Oksendal. I cannot see how holders inequality and the ito isometry are applied.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
The estimate by Fatou's lemma says that
$$ Y^{(n)}_t(\omega) \rightarrow X_t(\omega) $$
in $L^2(\Omega \times [0, T])$.
Since $\sigma(t,x)$ is Lipschitz in $x$,
$$ \sigma(t, Y^{(n)}_t(\omega)) \rightarrow \sigma(t, X_t(\omega)) $$
in $L^2(\Omega \times [0, T])$ also. So Ito isometry tells you that
$$ \int_0 ^t \sigma(s, Y^{(n)}_s(\omega)) dB_s \rightarrow \int_0 ^t \sigma(s, X_s(\omega))dB_s $$
in $L^2(\Omega)$.
The second claim about the path-wise Lebesgue integral is similar: it follows from Holder inequality that on a finite measure space ($\Omega \times [0, T]$ in this case), $L^1$-norm is bounded by $L^2$-norm. This shows convergence in $L^1(\Omega)$.