Is the motivation behind the introduction of measure theory the Lebesgue integral? In order to evaluate such an integral we need the length of each of the horizontal strip of width $h$. I have a question here. Why do we need such a general concept of measure? Length is a kind of measure, but why did Lebesgue think of so general a concept of "measure" when he just needed the length to evaluate his integrals? Is there any other motivation behind this ?
2026-04-12 10:49:50.1775990990
Motivation behind introduction of measure theory
1.6k Views Asked by user21982 https://math.techqa.club/user/user21982/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in INTUITION
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Intuition for $\int_Cz^ndz$ for $n=-1, n\neq -1$
- Intuition on Axiom of Completeness (Lower Bounds)
- What is the point of the maximum likelihood estimator?
- Why are functions of compact support so important?
- What is it, intuitively, that makes a structure "topological"?
- geometric view of similar vs congruent matrices
- Weighted average intuition
- a long but quite interesting adding and deleting balls problem
- What does it mean, intuitively, to have a differential form on a Manifold (example inside)
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-INTEGRAL
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- Square Integrable Functions are Measurable?
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- Solving an integral by using the Dominated Convergence Theorem.
- Convergence of a seqence under the integral sign
- If $g \in L^1$ and $f_n \to f$ a.e. where $|f_n| \leq 1$, then $g*f_n \to g*f$ uniformly on each compact set.
- Integral with Dirac measure.
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof that $x \mapsto \int |u(x+y)-u(y)|^p \lambda^n(dy)$ is continuous
- a) Compute $T(1_{[\alpha,\beta]})$ for all $0<\alpha <\beta<0$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm not sure you can say there's a single motivation behind introducing a concept, but I found multiple motivations behind the introduction to measure theory I saw.
First, the Cantor set. It's hard to talk about the length of the Cantor set rigorously since it's not a single interval, but the result of a countable intersection of unions of intervals. Lebesgue measure makes it easier to see that the "length" of the Cantor set is zero, and then to see that length and cardinality are not very well correlated.
Second, once Lebesgue measure is defined for $\mathbb{R}^d$, integration in multiple dimensions is essentially as easily defined as integration in one dimension (see Stein and Shakarchi's Real Analysis where the Lebesgue integral is immediately defined for arbitrary positive integer dimension). Another matter brought up in that book is that not all possible Fourier series, in the sense of sequences $\{ a_n \} \in \ell^2(\mathbb{Z})$, have corresponding Riemann integrable functions. However, they do have corresponding Lebesgue integrable functions, and this integral requires the Lebesgue measure.
But for more complicated measures, I think the main motivations I saw in my case were probability spaces (which leads to cool applications in probability), and the counting measure. One of the really nice things about the counting measure is that it clearly shows that sums and integrals are "the same", so that you can prove theorems about discrete and continuous objects at the same time (for example, Hölder's, Minkowski's, and Hilbert's inequalities).