I see that some authors say that there are sets, for example, $\mathbb{N}$ and $\mathsf{Bool}$, that are $\neg\neg$-stable (i.e., satisfying $\neg\neg X\rightarrow X$). I understand what it means when $X$ is a proposition, but what does it mean for a set (e.g., $\mathbb{N}$, $\mathsf{Bool}$) to be $\neg\neg$-stable? Thanks in advance!
2026-03-25 11:08:02.1774436882
$\neg\neg$-Stability
112 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in TYPE-THEORY
- Are Proofs of Dependent Pair Types Equivalent to Finding an Inverse Function?
- Types as formulas?
- Dependent vs. polymorphic types in modern type theories
- What in general is a recursor?
- 'Logically symmetric' expressions in lambda calculus
- (Higher order) logic/type theory/category theory like (meta-)grammar/language/machine?
- Cardinal collapse and (higher) toposes
- Does Diaconescu's theorem imply cubical type theory is non-constructive?
- Dependent type theory: universes may have a type?
- Define $\neg\neg A$ to be truncation using LEM
Related Questions in CONSTRUCTIVE-MATHEMATICS
- How do set theories base on Intuitionistic Logic deal with ordinals?
- Constructive Proof- How to Start?
- Does Diaconescu's theorem imply cubical type theory is non-constructive?
- Attempt at constructive proof of compactness of [0,1], does this use LEM? Does a constructive proof exist?
- Constructive proof of existence of maximal ideal
- Is there a theorem that can easily be proved to be non intuitionistic?
- What kinds of variables range over proofs?
- Construct a real $x$ such that ZF does not prove whether $x\in\mathbb{Q}$
- Infinitesimal Approaches To Differential Geometry As Conservative Extension
- Confusion around quantifiers in intuitionistic logic
Related Questions in INTUITIONISTIC-LOGIC
- Are Proofs of Dependent Pair Types Equivalent to Finding an Inverse Function?
- Prove the undecidability of a formula
- Semantics for minimal logic
- Is minimal logic equivalent to intuitionistic?
- How do set theories base on Intuitionistic Logic deal with ordinals?
- Why is intuitionistic modelling called forcing?
- Attempt at constructive proof of compactness of [0,1], does this use LEM? Does a constructive proof exist?
- Is there a theorem that can easily be proved to be non intuitionistic?
- Interpretation of implication in intuitionistic logic
- $\mathbb Q$ topological semantics for intuitionistic propositional logic
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Welcome to math.SE! Given the tags, (and the recent related question where the examples $\mathbb{N}$ and $\mathbf{Bool}$ came up), I will answer in the context of intuitionistic type theory. There are other, related notions of stability, e.g. in topological semantics, where certain sets can be stable; I will not touch upon these scenarios.
Under the propositions-as-types interpretation (see The HoTT Book, section 1.11), we identify each proposition $P$ with the type ($\approx$ collection) of all its proofs, and each type $S$ with the proposition that $S$ has an inhabitant ($\approx$ element). So each inhabitant of $S$ gives rise to a proof of the corresponding proposition. For example, the empty type $\bot$ can be seen as a false proposition: it is not provable, and viewed as a collection it has no inhabitants.
Under propositions-as-types, conjunctions $\wedge$ usually correspond to the formation of Cartesian product types $\times$, and implications to the formation function types $\rightarrow$. Negation is defined in terms of the empty type $\bot$ and function types: the expression $\neg S$ simply abbreviates the function type $S \rightarrow \bot$. This type has all functions with domain $S$ and codomain $\bot$ as inhabitants. For example, $\bot \rightarrow \bot$ has an inhabitant: the function $x \mapsto x$.
The type $\mathbb{N}$ of natural numbers corresponds to the proposition "$\mathbb{N}$ has inhabitants", and its inhabitants $0,1,2,\dots$ of the type $\mathbb{N}$ correspond to proofs of this proposition.
Putting everything together, the type $\neg\neg \mathbb{N}$ abbreviates the collection of functions $(\mathbb{N} \rightarrow \bot) \rightarrow \bot$. This type is inhabited, for example the function $f \mapsto f(12)$ inhabits it.
So what does it mean for $\mathbb{N}$ to be $\neg\neg$-stable? It means that the function type $\neg\neg \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ has an inhabitant. This is easy to show: for example, the function $f \mapsto 51$ associates to every inhabitant $f$ of the type $\neg\neg \mathbb{N}$ an inhabitant of the type $\mathbb{N}$ (namely $51$) , so $f \mapsto 51$ inhabits the type $\neg\neg \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$.
In more sophisticated type theories, such as Homotopy Type Theory, people prefer to use subtler variants of the propositions-as-types interpretation, but the underlying idea remains the same: $\neg\neg$-stability of the type $S$ means that we can find an inhabitant of the type $((S \rightarrow \bot) \rightarrow \bot) \rightarrow S$.