Can someone explain the difference between ¬∀x P(x) and ∀x ¬P(x), and also why
¬∀xP (x) ≡ ∃x ¬P (x) can't be written as ¬∀x P(x) ≡ ¬∃x P(x) and vice versa.
Thanks.
Can someone explain the difference between ¬∀x P(x) and ∀x ¬P(x), and also why
¬∀xP (x) ≡ ∃x ¬P (x) can't be written as ¬∀x P(x) ≡ ¬∃x P(x) and vice versa.
Thanks.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Let the universe of discourse be bricks, that is, all our quantifiers are over the set of all bricks ($x$ is a brick). Let $P(x)$ be the statement that $x$ is red.
$\neg \forall x P(x)$: not all bricks are red,
$\forall x \neg P(x)$: all bricks are not red.
It should be apparent that the first statement is true but the second is false. However, the first statement is equivalent to
$\exists x \neg P(x)$: there is a brick that is not red,
but not
$ \neg \exists x P(x)$: there is not a red brick.
These statements are obvious once written out in plain English instead of possibly unfamiliar symbols.