It is well-known that a metric space is compact iff it is totally bounded and complete. More generally, it is well-known that a uniform space is compact iff it is totally bounded and complete. Is there a similar such characterization of compactness for quasi uniform spaces?
2026-02-23 10:16:54.1771841814
non-symmetric version of compact = totally bounded + complete
402 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in METRIC-SPACES
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Is the following set open/closed/compact in the metric space?
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
Related Questions in COMPACTNESS
- Every nonempty perfect set in $\mathbb R^k$ is uncountable: Rudin's argument
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
- Is the distance between those compact sets equal to $0$?
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- Set of Positive Sequences that Sum to 1 is Compact under Product Topology?
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Proving the one-point compactification of a topological space is a topology
- Never Used Compact Closure...
- Continuity of the maximal element of a multi-valued function
- Consider the metric space of infinite sequences of 0s and 1s under this metric.
Related Questions in UNIFORM-SPACES
- Is $\approx$ actually an entourage?
- What is the hausdorff completion of this uniform structure on the real line?
- Completeness of Continuous Functions on Uniform Spaces
- What is the relation between chain connected with connected in uniform space?
- Is there a version of closing lemma in the case of uniform space?
- Closure of $A$ with respect to uniform topology
- The interior of the elements of a uniform structure $D$ is also base for $D$
- Why are compact Hausdorff spaces divisible - and other uniformity related questions
- Question about totally disconnected compact uniform space
- totally disconnected compact Hausdorff uniform space
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This answer is preliminary. Now I am looking in the papers and soon I shall extend the answer.
I am related with the subjects, but I am not a specialist. I looked into papers and can say you the following. If you are so interested and want to have a perfect answer, you may ask Hans-Peter Künzi (use this e-mail: Hans-peter.Kunzi (at) uct.ac.za).
So, IMHO, it seems the following.
A quasi-uniformity on a set $X$ is a filter $\mathcal U$ on $X\times X$ satisfying the conditions: Each $U\in\mathcal U$ is reflexive, and for each $U\in\mathcal U$ there is $V\in\mathcal U$ such that $V^2:=V\circ V\subset U$. Here $$V\circ V :=\{(x, z)\in X\times X:\mbox{ there is }y\in X\mbox{ such that }(x, y)\in V\mbox{ and }(y, z)\in V\}.$$ For each quasi-uniformity $\mathcal U$ the filter $\mathcal U^{-1}$ consisting of the inverse relations $$U^{-1}=\{(y, x)\in X\times X: (x, y)\in U\}$$ where $U\in\mathcal U$ is called the conjugate quasi-uniformity of $\mathcal U$. A quasi-uniformity $\mathcal U$ is said to be a uniformity if $\mathcal U^{-1}=\mathcal U.$ If $\mathcal U_1$ and $\mathcal U_2$ are quasi-uniformities on $X$ such that $\mathcal U_1\subset \mathcal U_2$, then $\mathcal U_1$ is called coarser than $\mathcal U_2$. The coarsest uniformity $\mathcal U^s$ finer than $\mathcal U$ is generated by the subbase $\mathcal U\cup\mathcal U^{-1}$. [Kü1]
A quasi-uniform space $(X,\mathcal U)$ is called precompact (resp. totally bounded) if for each $U\in\mathcal U$, a cover $\{U(x): x\in X\}$ has a finite subcover (resp. $\mathcal U^s$ is precompact). A uniform space is totally bounded iff it is precompact. Every totally bounded quasi-uniform space is precompact but the converse does not hold, in general. [Lam] A quasi-uniform space $(X,\mathcal U)$ is totally bounded iff it is doubly hereditarily precompact, that is both $\mathcal U$ and $\mathcal U^{-1}$ are hereditarily precompact. [Kü1] Each compact quasi-uniform space is precompact, but the converse does not hold, in general, too. As a simple example I can propose Sorgenfrey circle that is the unit circle $\Bbb T=\{e^{i\varphi}:\varphi\in\Bbb R\}$ endowed with a quasi-uniformity generated by a base $\{U_n\}$, where $U_n=\{(x,y)\in\Bbb T: y=xe^{i\varphi}$ and $\varphi\in [0,1/n)\}.$ Sorgenfrey circle is a precompact quasi-uniform space, which is neither compact nor totally bounded. On the other hand, a quasi-uniform space is precompact if and only if every ultrafilter is a Cauchy filter [FL]. At last, there exists a compact quasi-uniform space which is not totally bounded: let $a<b$ be real numbers; endow the set of the reals with a quasi-uniformity generated by a base $\{\{(x, y):x = y$ or $a < x < b\}\}$ [Lam]. From the other side, for an arbitrary topological space $X$ the Pervin quasi-uniformity is the finest compatible totally bounded quasi-uniformity of $X$. I recall that each topological space $(X; \tau)$ is quasi-uniformizable, since $\tau$ coincides with the topology induced by the Pervin quasi-uniformity generated by the subbase $\{[X\setminus G\times X]\cup [X \times G] : G\in\tau\}$. [Kü1]
There are several notions of completeness for quasi-uniform spaces [Kü1-2].
A quasi-uniform space $(X, \mathcal U)$ is called bicomplete provided that $\mathcal U^s$ is a complete uniformity. So, a quasi-uniform space $(X, \mathcal U)$ is totally bounded and bicomplete iff $(X, \mathcal U^s)$ is a complete precompact uniform space iff $(X, \mathcal U^s)$ is compact. In this case the space $(X, \mathcal U)$ is compact too. Sorgenfrey circle is bicomplete and precompact, but it is neither compact nor totally bounded.
A topological space is supersober if the convergence set of each convergent ultrafilter is the closure of some unique singleton. In particular, each Hausdorff space is supersober. The class of locally compact strongly sober spaces (sometimes also called skew compact; see Kopperman [Ko, Comment 4.12]), is a suitable analogue in the category $Top_0$ of $T_0$-spaces to the class of compact spaces in the category of Hausdorff spaces. Here “strongly sober” means “compact and supersober”. The strongly sober locally compact spaces (see also the articles of Hötzel Escardó [HE], Lawson [Law], Salbany and Todorov [ST] and Smyth [Sm] for further details) can be characterized as the topological $T_0$-spaces that admit a totally bounded bicomplete quasi-uniformity. It is the coarsest compatible quasi-uniformity of such spaces. [Kü2]
A filter $\mathcal F$ on a quasi-uniform space $(X, \mathcal U)$ is said to be left $K$-Cauchy (resp. right $K$-Cauchy) if for each $U\in \mathcal U$ there is $F\in \mathcal F$ such that $U(x)\in \mathcal F$ (resp. $U^{-1}(x)\in \mathcal F$) whenever $x\in F$. A quasi-uniformity is called left (resp. right) $K$-complete provided that each left (resp. right) $K$-Cauchy filter converges. A quasi-uniform space is compact iff it is precompact and left $K$-complete [Kü3]. A quasi-uniform space $(X, \mathcal U)$ is hereditarily precompact if and only if each ultrafilter is left $K$-Cauchy (equivalently, each filter is co-stable). Here a filter is called co-stable if it is stable in the conjugate space. A filter $\mathcal F$ on a quasi-uniform space $(X, \mathcal U)$ is called stable if $\bigcap_{F\in\mathcal F} U(F)\in\mathcal F$ whenever $U\in\mathcal U$. [Kü1]
References
[FL] P. Fletcher, W.F. Lindgren, Quasi-Uniform Spaces, Lecture Notes Pure Appl. Math. Vol. 77, Dekker, New York, 1982.
[HE] M. Hötzel Escardó , The regular-locally compact core of a stably locally compact locale, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 157, 41-55.
[KMRV] H-P. A. Künzi, M. Mršević, I.L. Reilly, M.K. Vamanamurthy, Convergence, precompactness and symmetry in quasi-uniform spaces, Mathematica Japonica, 01/1993, 38:2.
[Ko] R. D. Kopperman, Asymmetry and duality in topology, Topology Appl., 66, 1-39.
[Kü1] H-P. A. Künzi, Quasi-uniform spaces, (April 28, 2001).
[Kü2] H-P.A. Künzi, Quasi-uniform spaces in the year 2001, (? in Recent Progress in General Topology, II, 313-344, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002).
[Kü3] H-P.A. Künzi, Nonsymmetric topology, in Topology with Applications, Bolyai Soc. Math. Studies, Vol. 4, Szekszárd, 1993, 303-338.
[Kü4] H-P.A. Künzi, Totally bounded quiet quasi-uniformities, Topology Proceedings, 01/1990, 15.
[Lam] P. Th. Lambrinos, On precompact (quasi-) uniform structures, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 62:2, 1977, 365-366.
[Law] J. D. Lawson, Order and strongly sober compactifications, in: Topology and Category Theory in Computer Science, Reed, G. M., A. W. Roscoe and R. F. Wachter, eds., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 179-205.
[Sm] M. B. Smyth, Stable compactification I, J. London Math. Soc., 45, 321-340.
[ST] S. Salbany, T. Todorov. Nonstandard analysis in topology: Nonstandard and standard compactifications, Journal Symbol. Logic, 65, 1836-1840.