I found a statement in the book "Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems" written by M.I.Freidlin and A.D. Wentzell that is not justified. Specifically, in a smooth domain $D \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ let us consider the Dirichlet's problem $$\mathcal{L}u(x) + c(x)u(x) = f(x),~~x\in D;\quad u(x)|_{x\in \partial D} = g(x),$$ in which $\mathcal{L}u(x) = \frac 12\sum_{i,j} a^{ij}(x)\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^i\partial x^j}(x) + \sum_i b^i(x)\frac{\partial u}{\partial x^i}(x) $ with $a(x) = (a^{ij}(x))=\sigma(x)\sigma^T(x)$. Here $c(x)$, $f(x)$, for $x \in \mathbb R^n$, and $g(x)$, for $x\in \partial D$, are bounded continuous functions. If we suppose that $\mathcal{L}$ is uniformly elliptic, then under the additional assumption that $c(x) \leq 0$, this problem admits a solution provided by the Feynman-Kac formula, i.e., $$u(x) = -\mathbb{E}_x \int_0^\tau f(X_t)\exp\left\{\int_0^t c(X_s) ds\right\} + \mathbb{E}_x~ g(X_\tau)\exp\left\{\int_0^t c(X_s) ds\right\},$$ where $\tau = \inf\{t\colon X_t\notin D\}$ is the first exit time of the process defined via $dX_t = b(X_t)dt + \sigma(X_t)dW_t$ from the domain $D$. The authors claimed that "If $c(x) > 0$, then as is well known, Dirichlet's problem can "go out to the spectrum"; the solution of the equation $\mathcal{L}u + c(x)u = 0$ with vanishing boundary values may not be unique in this case." May I know why the last statement holds? Can you provide a baby example showing such non-uniqueness of solutions?
2026-03-28 08:08:06.1774685286
Non-uniqueness of a Dirichlet's problem
164 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in ELLIPTIC-EQUATIONS
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Definition of constant coefficient elliptic operator
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Harmonic functions satisfying given inequality
- How to get the equation of an ellipse given the center, directrix and length of latus rectum?
- Regularity of the Divergence of Weak Solutions to Elliptic PDEs
- Showing that a function is harmonic
- Define a "Neumann" trace of a harmonic function on bounded domain
- How to determine if elliptic equation comes from variational problem?
- What is the parametric equation of a rotated Ellipse (given the angle of rotation)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The simplest example is to just take $c$ to be a (constant) eigenvalue of the operator. For example, if we take $\mathcal{L} = \Delta$, then we can find an infinite sequence of eigenfunction/eigenvalue solution to $$ \begin{cases} -\Delta u_k = \lambda_k u_k &\text{in } D \\ u_k = 0 & \text{on } \partial D. \end{cases} $$ These can be found in a number of ways. For example, we can minimize the functional $E(u) = \int_D |\nabla u|^2$ over $H^1_0(D)$ subject to the constraint that $J(u) = \int_D |u|^2 =1$ in order to find the principal eigenvalue, $\lambda_0>0$.
Once we have these, we immediately see that we cannot have unique solutions to $$ \begin{cases} \Delta u + \lambda_k u = f &\text{in } D \\ u = 0 & \text{on } \partial D \end{cases} $$ for any $k$.