I'm reading a paper of Lubotzky and Mann (J. Algebra 105, 1987, 484-505), and Im doubtful in a proof.
Proposition. Let $N$ powerfully embedded subgroup of $G$. If $N$ is the normal closure of some subset of $G$, then $N$ is actually generated by this subset.
Proof. Let $N = \langle A \rangle^{G}$. To find generator for $N$, we may assume $N^{p} = 1$. But then $N$ is central in $G$, and $N = \langle A \rangle^{G} = \langle A \rangle$.
Why we may assume $N^{p} = 1$? The proof follows trivially by it. (In this case, $p$ is odd).
$N$ is powerfully embedded in $G$ and so $[N,G] \leq N^{p}$ and so it follows $[N,N] \leq N^{p}$ and so $N$ is powerful. Hence $ N^{p} $ is the Frattini subgroup, $\Phi(N)$ of $N$.
Informally you might like to think of the Frattini subgroup of $N$ consisting of the "non generators" of $N$.
The Burnside Basis Theorem tells you that you have a generating set for $N$ if and only if the images of that set form a basis in $N/\Phi(N)$ viewed as a vector space, which in this case is $N/N^{p}$.
Hence you may assume $N^{p}$ is trivial as you could quotient out by it, choose your generating set, and then lift back up.