Let $f$ be a function from $A$ to $B$ such that the image $f(A)\subset A$. Is there a widely accepted notation for the expression $$f\circ\left(f\circ\cdots(f\circ f)\right),$$ where $f$ composite with itself $n$ times? I failed to find a natural way to include the information $n$ in the notation.
2026-03-27 05:24:56.1774589096
On
Notation of iterated composition of functions
139 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
0
On
A cleaner way to define the function above and the notation is presented below.
Let $f: A \longrightarrow A$ and for $n \in \mathbb{N}$, let $$ f^n(x) := \begin{cases} f(x), & n=1 \\ f(f^{n-1}(x)), & n>1. \end{cases} $$
A straightforward proof by induction shows that $f(f^n(x)) = f^n(f(x))$ for every natural number $n$.
Some have suggested the notation $f^{(n)}$ but, as noted in other comments, this is usually reserved for the $n^\text{th}$-derivative of $f$, which is also defined recursively.
You wrote $f(B)\subset A$ but probably meant to write something like $B\subseteq A$ (or $f(A)\subseteq A$).
I would plead for presenting $f$ not as a function $A\to B$ but as a function $A\to A$.
This because $f\circ f$ is only properly defined if the codomain of $f$ coincides with the domain of $f$.
The collection $M$ of functions $f:A\to A$ can be looked at as a monoid with the map prescribed by $a\mapsto a$ as identity and composition of functions as (associative) multiplication.
In a monoid $\langle M,\circ\rangle$ it is quite common to write $f^n$ for expression $f\circ\cdots\circ f$ containing $f$ exactly $n$ times.
So this is a nice justification for that notation.