I am by no means a mathmatician. I guess you could say that I am a mathematically inclined individual, but never made anything of it until I was in my 30's and became a software engineer. Although I've never taken the math classes that I should have, the concepts still fascinate me, and I have a question.
I was watching an episode of Numb3rs and they stated what seemed like a fairly simple geometry/trigonometry question that I just could not wrap my brain around entirely.
They stated that with a few photos of the same location, by looking at the shadows caused by the sun, and knowing 1 distance in the pics and knowing the "exact" time stamp of the images, that they could calculate the exact (within a hundredth of a degree) location of the photos.
As I said before, I am no math expert, but wouldn't you also need 1 angle? Is what they said accurate? Could you calculate the angle based on the timestamps and the shadows given the height of the object that made the shadow?
Edit: I'm curious, If I posted 4 pictures (15 min apart, with accurate timestamps) with at least 1 item that was a known length, would some one take me up on the challenge of locating where the photos were taken?
Here is a sketch. Imagine that you've put a stick in the ground somewhere in the world whose height is known and you take pictures of its shadow at various times. Assume it has a shadow in each picture, and assume you can accurately deduce the length of the shadow from the pictures. Any given picture will tell you how far you are from the point on the Earth to which the Sun is closest at the time the picture is taken (the longer the shadow, the farther you are from that point; this should be some pretty straightforward trigonometry), so it narrows down your location to a circle (similar to a circle of latitude). This point moves as the Sun moves. If it moves enough, two pictures narrow down your location to the intersection of two circles, which should be two points. Three pictures should be enough to narrow down the location of the stick completely, in theory.
In practice I see some minor problems.