By an order preserving map $f : \mathbb Q \to \mathbb Q$, let us mean $ x > y \implies f(x) > f(y)$ . Let $Aut (\mathbb Q) =\{ f : \mathbb Q \to \mathbb Q : f $ is bijective and order preserving $\}$. Then $Aut (\mathbb Q)$ acts naturally on $\mathbb Q^n$ as $f . (a_1,...,a_n)=(f(a_1),...,f(a_n))$. Then is it true that the number of orbits under this action is finite ?
2026-02-22 21:23:03.1771795383
Number of orbits of the natural action of order preserving bijections of $\mathbb Q$ on $\mathbb Q^n$
49 Views Asked by user495643 https://math.techqa.club/user/user495643/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in GROUP-ACTIONS
- Orbit counting lemma hexagon
- Showing a group G acts on itself by right multiplication
- $N\trianglelefteq G$, $A$ a conjugacy class in $G$ such that $A\subseteq N$, prove $A$ is a union of conjugacy classes
- Show that the additive group $\mathbb{Z}$ acts on itself by $xy = x+y$ and find all $x\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $xy = y$ for all $y\in\mathbb{Z}$.
- Number of different k-coloring of an $n\times m$ grid up to rows and columns permutations
- How to embed $F_q^\times $ in $S_n$?
- orbit representatives for the group of unipotent matrix acting on the set of skew-symmetric matrices
- $S_n$ right-action on $V^{\otimes n}$
- Interpretation of wreath products in general and on symmetric groups
- Regarding action of a group factoring through
Related Questions in ORDERED-FIELDS
- Embedding from Rational Numbers to Ordered Field is Order Preserving
- Can algebraic numbers be compared using only rational arithmetic?
- Completeness of $\Bbb R(x)$?
- Does every ordered divisible abelian group admit an expansion (and how many) to an ordered field?
- Category theory and real closed fields
- Number of orbits of the natural action of order preserving bijections of $\mathbb Q$ on $\mathbb Q^n$
- well ordering principle and ordered field
- If $S<G:=\text{Gal}(E/R)$ is a Sylow 2-subgroup, then $[\text{Fix}_E(S):R] = [G:S]$
- Trouble constructing an ordered set that is not directed
- When $xyz=1$ why is $x+y+z\geq3$? ($x,y,z>0$)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes it is true. One way to prove it is to prove that two $n$-uples $(a_1,\dots,a_n)$ and $(b_1,\dots,b_n)$ are in the same orbit if and only if they are arranged in the same order, i.e. if and only if $a_i < a_j\Leftrightarrow b_i< b_j$ and $a_i=a_j\Leftrightarrow b_i=b_j$. So the number of orbits will be equal to the number of possible orderings of your $n$ numbers. Such an ordering is completely described by the function that gives to every $a_i$ its rank, so the set of such ordering is in bijection with the set of functions $\{1,\cdots,n\}\to \{1,\cdots,n\}$ whose image is $\{1,\cdots, m\}$ for some $m$. In particular, there must be less than $n^n$ such orders.
It's pretty clear that two $n$-uples in the same orbit must have the same order; for the other direction, it is enough to prove that if $a_1<a_2<\cdots <a_m$ and $b_1<b_2<\cdots<b_m$ then there exist an order-preserving bijection $f:\mathbb{Q}\to \mathbb{Q}$ such that $f(a_i)=b_i$ for all $i$. But for that you can just take a piecewise-affine function between the points $(a_i,b_i)$ and $(a_{i+1},b_{i+1})$; since all the $a_i,b_i$ are rationals, every piece will be $\mathbb{Q}$-affine, and thus map rationals to rationals bijectively.