Inspired by this paper
Introduction
In this paper, a sequential representation of a number is a formula that uses the digits 1-9 in order with the mathematical operations +, -, ×, ÷, ^, as well as brackets, and digit-to-digit concatenation.
For example, 100 can be represented as follows: $$100 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 × 9$$ More complicated formulae look more like this: $$11106 = (1 + 2^3)^4 + 567 × 8 + 9$$ $$1+i = (-1)^{(2+3+4)/(5+6+7)}-8+9$$
Question
Curiously enough, a solution the number 10958 has not been found*, despite extensive searching and computing. It was even touched upon in a numberphile video.
Can we prove certain numbers must or must not have a sequential representation?
*Cited as "still not available" in the paper
Related questions
Note: don't strain yourself, they're not as important.
What is the trivial minimum/maximum bounds with sequential representation?
Can we answer these questions with more simple rules? Such as removing concatenation or exponentiation. Or perhaps the rule of digit order?
Since there is a finite amount of combinations one can make with these digits and operations, how many combinations are there?
How many unique numbers have a sequential representation?