Suppose $$\sum_{k\ {\rm odd}}^n {n \choose k} 2^{(k-1)/2} = \sum_{k\ {\rm odd}}^m {m \choose k} 2^{(k-1)/2} 3^{(m-k)/2}.$$ Does $m=n=1$?
Clearly $m \leq n$, and for every $n$ there is at most one $m$.
Suppose $$\sum_{k\ {\rm odd}}^n {n \choose k} 2^{(k-1)/2} = \sum_{k\ {\rm odd}}^m {m \choose k} 2^{(k-1)/2} 3^{(m-k)/2}.$$ Does $m=n=1$?
Clearly $m \leq n$, and for every $n$ there is at most one $m$.
On
Ricardo,
Your equation only has finite number of solutions, but in order to check whether $m=n=1$ is the unique solution, you would need some numerical verification and the existing bounds might not be sufficiently effective.
Relevant references:
The equivalence of your problem to finding intersections of two linear recursive sequences $u_n=v_p$, where $p=2m+1$ and
$u_{n+1}=2u_{n}+u_{n-1}$, with $u_0=0$, $u_1=1$;
$v_{p+1}=10v_{p}-v_{p-1}$, with $v_0=1$, $v_1=11$,
can be seen by either directly using the original representation in sum or using the closed-form solutions in Markus Scheuer’s answer.
This set-up has been studied in much greater generality in the reference above. Since $u$ and $v$ are not related, there are only finite solutions. There is some bound of the size of the solutions in 3 but I am not sure how effective they are. You might want to go through more recent work, e.g.,
to see if any improvement has been developed.
Here we find a closed expression for the series and show that a solution with $m$ even is not possible.
Comment:
In (1) we replace $k$ with $2k+1$ in the summands without changing anything since we add only zeros.
In (2) we do a rearrangement which is helpful for further steps.
We conclude from (3) and (4) OPs equation is equivalent with
In case $m=n=1$ we obtain \begin{align*} \left(1+\sqrt{2}\right)-\left(1-\sqrt{2}\right)&=2\sqrt{2}\\ \\ \left(\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{2}\right)-\left(\sqrt{3}-\sqrt{2}\right)&=2\sqrt{2} \end{align*} and equality holds.
Conclusion: OPs equation is not valid if $m$ is even.
The case $m$ odd needs further investigations.