Let $R$ be a commutative ring and $M$ an $R$-module. Then under what condition can we deduce that for any nonzero $R$-module $N$, $M\otimes_RN\neq0$?
2026-03-26 22:17:42.1774563462
On characterizing modules that don't annihilate any module under tensor product.
68 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Related Questions in FLATNESS
- Difficulty understanding Hartshorne Theorem IV.4.11
- Flat modules over a PID
- Submodule of a flat module.
- When an integral extension of integral domains is flat?
- When flat submodule is direct summand?
- Flatness in a short exact sequence. If the
- Localization and flatness
- Computing $\operatorname{Tor}^R_1(M,N)$
- Does flatness ascend through a free ring map?
- Can it be that $R[[x]]$ is flat over $R$ but not over $R[x]$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Not necessarily. If $M$ is a flat $R$-module, then what you claim is true ($M \otimes_R N \neq 0$ whenever $N \neq 0$) if and only if $M$ is faithfully flat. Note that all projective modules are flat, but they don't have to be faithfully flat.
But the results are very nice when your ring is local. If $R$ is a local ring, then $M$ is free $\iff$ $M$ is projective. If $M$ is finitely generated, or if the unique maximal ideal of $R$ is nilpotent, then free/projective/flat/faithfully flat are all equivalent.
This last thing I mentioned is less well known, so let me give a proof. Suppose $M$ is flat, $(R,\mathfrak m)$ is local, and $\mathfrak m^N = 0$ for some $N$. One can show using the 'equational criterion for flatness' that a set of elements $x_1, ... , x_n \in M$ is linearly independent over $R$ if and only if the images $x_1 + \mathfrak m M, ... , x_n + \mathfrak m M$ in $M/\mathfrak m M$ are linearly independent over $R/\mathfrak m$.
It follows that a basis $x_i + \mathfrak m$ for $M/\mathfrak m M$ over $R/\mathfrak m$ lifts to a linearly independent set $x_i$ in $M$ over $R$. Letting $N = \sum\limits_i Rx_i$, you have $$M = N + \mathfrak m M = N + \mathfrak m(N + \mathfrak m M) = N + \mathfrak m^2 M$$ $$ = N + \mathfrak m^3 M = \cdots = N + \mathfrak m^N M = N + 0$$ so $M$ is free. Hence $M$ is also faithfully flat and projective.