Originally from Proposition 8 of Tao's note: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2015/10/23/275a-notes-3-the-weak-and-strong-law-of-large-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-682885.
Let ${N}$ be a natural number, and let ${Y_1, Y_2, \dots}$ be an infinite sequence of “coupons”, which are iid and uniformly distributed from the finite set ${\{1,\dots,N\}}$. For each ${i=0,\dots,N}$, let ${T_{i,N}}$ denote the first time one has collected ${i}$ coupons out of ${N}$, thus ${T_{i,N}}$ is the first non-negative integer such that ${\{Y_1,\dots,Y_{T_{i,N}}\}}$ has cardinality ${i}$, with
$\displaystyle 0 = T_{0,N} < T_{1,N} < \dots < T_{N,N} = T_N$.
Write ${X_i := T_{i,N} - T_{i-1,N}}$ for ${i=1,\dots,N}$. For any choice of natural numbers ${j_1,\dots,j_N}$, it is stated that "in order for the event ${X_1 = j_1 \wedge \dots \wedge X_N = j_N}$ to hold, the first coupon ${Y_1}$ can be arbitrary, but the coupons ${Y_2,\dots,Y_{j_1}}$ have to be equal to ${Y_1}$; then ${Y_{j_1+1}}$ must be from one of the remaining ${N-1}$ elements of ${\{1,\dots,N\}}$ not equal to ${Y_1}$, and ${Y_{j_1+2},\dots,Y_{j_1+j_2}}$ must be from the two-element set ${\{Y_1,Y_{j_1+1}\}}$; and so on and so forth up to ${Y_{j_1+\dots+j_N}}$."
Question: The statement in bold seems to hold for $T_{i,N}$ defined to be the last time one has collected $i$ coupons out of $N$, rather than the first time. What do I misunderstand?
There is indeed an error, but it’s not that the $T_{i,N}$ should be defined as you suggest. They’re defined correctly, and your suggested definition wouldn’t work, not least because there’s no last time at which one has collected all $N$ coupons.
Rather, in the statement in bold the indices are wrong, and the segmentation by semicolons confusingly groups factors from different terms in the sum together. A correct version with more natural segmentation would be: