As a reader seeing an equation like $$ \sum_{i=1}^3 1+1 $$ (as "everybody" writes it without parenthesis)
Is it
- Sum before Addition: $\sum_{i=1}^3 1+1=\left(\sum_{i=1}^3 1\right)+1=4$
- Addition before Sum: $\sum_{i=1}^3 1+1=\sum_{i=1}^3 \left(1+1\right)=6$
Sometimes it is imho used even conversely
- $\sum_{i=1}^3 i+1$ is often assumed to be $\left(\sum_{i=1}^3 i\right)+1=7$
- however $\sum_{i=1}^3 1+i$ can only be calculated as: $\sum_{i=1}^3 \left(1+i\right)=9$
Update: Let's take an realistic example from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interatomic_potential#Functional_form
$$ V_\mathrm{TOT} = \sum_{i}^N V_1(\vec r_i) + \sum_{i,j}^N V_2(\vec r_i,\vec r_j) + \sum_{i,j,k}^N V_3(\vec r_i,\vec r_j,\vec r_k) + \cdots $$
is it
- $V_\mathrm{TOT} = \left[\sum_{i}^N V_1(\vec r_i)\right] + \left[\sum_{i,j}^N V_2(\vec r_i,\vec r_j)\right] + \left[\sum_{i,j,k}^N V_3(\vec r_i,\vec r_j,\vec r_k)\right] + \cdots$
- $V_\mathrm{TOT} = \sum_{i}^N \left(V_1(\vec r_i) + \sum_{j}^N \left[V_2(\vec r_i,\vec r_j) + \sum_{k}^N \left\{V_3(\vec r_i,\vec r_j,\vec r_k) + \cdots\right\}\right]\right)$
I know the answer: $$V_\mathrm{TOT} = \left[\sum_{i}^N V_1(\vec r_i)\right] + \left[\sum_{i=1}^{N-1} \sum_{j=i+1}^N V_2(\vec r_i,\vec r_j)\right] + \left[\sum_{i}^{N-2} \sum_{j=i+1}^{N-1} \sum_{k=j+1}^N V_3(\vec r_i,\vec r_j,\vec r_k)\right] + \cdots$$
It is very often that someone writes $\sum_{i=1}^3 a_i+\sum_{j=1}^3 b_j$, letting the reader decide if b_1,b_2,b_3 should be counted once or three times.
As a writer I could make parantheses, but as a reader I can't.
Update2:
- In $\sum_i A_i + \sum_j a_{ij}$ most would assume $\sum_i \left[A_i + \sum_j a_{ij}\right]$
- but in $\sum_i A_i + \sum_j a_{j}$ most would assume $\left[\sum_i A_i\right] + \sum_j a_{j}$
I think equations should not be inperpreted differently based on there use, I think any valid form of equation should be unambiguous.
It is actually 3. Confusing and unclear.
There is no established rule about how far the summation operator reaches. The most important reason is that usually, when we are summing something like $$\sum_{i=1}^3 a_i$$ the expression $a_i$ depends on the value of $i$, and if we are careful so as not to overload the variable $i$, it should be clear that basically, the summation operator reaches as far as is needed so that the expression makes sense. For example,
$$\sum_{i=1}^3 i + i$$ doesn't make sense if it is interpreted as $$\left(\sum_{i=1}^3 i\right) + i$$ because the value of $i$ is then left hanging.
I would say most of the time, the sum ends at the first $+$ symbol, so in your case, I would say that, if you force them to decide, most mathematicians will say the result is $4$.
But most mathematicians will likely first say that this is a needlessly unclear way of writing the sum, and will tell you to either use parentheses or reorder the sum to make it clear. For example,
$$1 + \sum_{i=1}^3 1$$ is unambiguously equal to $4$.