Here's a problem that has had me scratching my head for a long time:
Imagine you're in a game show, and are presented with 2 boxes. You are told that both boxes contain a sum of cash, but one of the boxes contains twice as much as the other. You do not know which box has the double prize. The game works in 2 phases:
- Choose any of the boxes you want.
- Look inside the box. At this point you can decide to keep the contents, or switch to the other box.
So imagine that you've chosen a box, and it contains \$100. From here, you can calculate the "expected value" of the other box to be $0.5 \times \$50 + 0.5 \times \$200 = \$125$ and therefore decide to switch.
But then it follows that you would have made the same decision for any value $x$ that you would have found in the first box! So then why not just pick the other box in the first place?
In other words, the strategy of "pick a box at random, and then switch, no matter what" is equivalent to "pick a candidate box at random, and then pick the other box, and keep it", which is also equivalent to "pick a box at random, and keep it". Which means that switching is the same as not switching.
But this seems like a paradox, because we just calculated that switching the box after your initial choice increases your expected winnings by a factor of 1.25!
Here is how you can view this in order to make it right for you:
The total amount of money in both boxes is $3X$ dollars
One box contains $X$ dollars and the other box contains $2X$ dollars
Now you pick a box, and you're thinking "maybe I should pick the other box":
So the expected amount of money that you'll get by picking the other box is $\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{2}{3}=\frac{1}{2}$
Note that $\frac{1}{2}$ of the amount of money is the expected (average) portion that you win.
In essence, you will win either $\frac{1}{3}$ of the amount of money or $\frac{2}{3}$ of the amount of money.