Let's say, $x$ is a function of $t$ ($x = x(t)$) and $y$ is a function of $t$ ($y = y(t)$). And, $f$ is a function of $x$ and $y$ ($f = f(x, y)$). Then by the chain rule $$\frac{df}{dt} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\frac{dx}{dt} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\frac{dy}{dt}$$. However, when you take the partial derivative of a function wrt a variable you keep all other variables constant. So, I am not sure how $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$ above can be calculated, since you cannot keep $y$ constant if $x$ is allowed to be varied and vice-versa. Can someone please explain what I am understanding wrong?
2026-04-06 23:01:43.1775516503
Partial Derivative Chain Rule When Variables Are Not Independent
536 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MULTIVARIABLE-CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- $\iint_{S} F.\eta dA$ where $F = [3x^2 , y^2 , 0]$ and $S : r(u,v) = [u,v,2u+3v]$
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- Prove all tangent plane to the cone $x^2+y^2=z^2$ goes through the origin
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Find the directional derivative in the point $p$ in the direction $\vec{pp'}$
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Define in which points function is continuous
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DERIVATIVE
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Partial derivative of a summation
- How might I find, in parametric form, the solution to this (first order, quasilinear) PDE?
- Solving a PDE given initial/boundary conditions.
- Proof for f must be a constant polynomial
Related Questions in CHAIN-RULE
- Show that $g \circ f$ is n times differentiable
- Chain rule with intermediate vector function
- Derivative and chain rule exam problem
- Derivative of square of skew symmetric matrix times a vector wrt the argument of the skew symmetric argument
- Show that certain properties remain under inversion
- Multi-variable chain rule - confusion in application
- Chain rule proof by definition
- Find the value of the function (Chain rule)
- Chain rule problem: given $f(x)=\sqrt{4x+7}$ and $g(x)=e^{x+4}$, compute $f(g(x))'$.
- Chain Rule partial derivatives and the wave equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The issue is that you are using $x$ as both as a free variable, and as a function, $x(t)$. And likewise $y$.
The notation $\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial t}$ is really being used as an implicit shorthand for $\dfrac{\partial f(x(t),y(t))}{\partial t}$.
$~$ Where $f(x(t),y(t))$ is a convolution of the bivariate function $f$, with monovariate functions $x$ and $y$, each evaluated with the same argument $t$, a free variable.
Likewise you are using the notation $\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ is used as shorthand for $\left.\dfrac{\partial f(u,v)}{\partial u}\right\vert_{\raise{2ex}{u:=x(t)\\v:=y(t)}}$ .
$~$ That means to evaluate the partial differential of $f$ with respect to its first argument and then form a composition by substituting those arguments with $x(t)$ and $y(t)$.
$~$ Thus you are evaluating the partial differential of the field $f(u,v)$ over the $t$ parametised curve $\{\langle x(t),y(t)\rangle\}$
So the chain rule is actually:
$$\dfrac{\partial f(x(t),y(t))}{\partial t}=\left.\dfrac{\partial f(u,v)}{\partial u}\right\vert_{\raise{2ex}{u:=x(t)\\v:=y(t)}}\cdotp\dfrac{\partial x(t)}{\partial t}+\left.\dfrac{\partial f(u,v)}{\partial v}\right\vert_{\raise{2ex}{u:=x(t)\\v:=y(t)}}\cdotp\dfrac{\partial y(t)}{\partial t}$$
But this is annoying to read and write, so the shorthand is used for convenience.