I have read in my textbook that if a Fourier series consists of only sine terms(that is, the function is odd), its phase angle is 0. If the Fourier series consists of only cosine terms(that is, the function is even), then the phase angle is 90 degrees. Can anyone provide an explanation?
2026-03-26 07:58:57.1774511937
Phase angle of a Fourier series
775 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in FOURIER-SERIES
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- Fourier series expansion of $\frac{\pi^4}{96}$ and $\frac{\pi^4}{90}$
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Fourier series. Find the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n+1}$
- How get a good approximation of integrals involving the gamma function, exponentials and the fractional part?
- The convolution theorem for fourier series.:$ \widehat{f*g}(x) =2π\hat{g}(x)\cdot\hat{f}(x) $
- Ergodicity of a skew product
- Fourier Series on $L^1\left(\left[0,1\right)\right)\cap C\left(\left[0,1\right)\right)$
- Parseval's Identity Proof Monotone/Dominated Convergence Theorem
- How can I interchange the sum signs
Related Questions in ANGLE
- How to find 2 points in line?
- Why are radians dimensionless?
- A discrete problem about coordinates or angle?
- Converting from Yaw,Pitch,Roll to Vector
- How do I calculate the angle between this two vectors?
- Given points $P(0, 3, 0) \;\;\; Q(-3, 4, 2) \;\;\; R(-2, 9, 1) \;$ find the measure of ∠PQR
- How do I find this angle?
- Length of Line Between Concentric Circles Based on Skew of Line to Circles
- How to find the norm of this vector and the angles between him and other?
- Find the measure of ∠PRQ, with points $P(0, 3, 0) \;\;\; Q(-3, 4, 2) \;\;\; R(-2, 9, 1) \;$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Well it has been a while since the question was submitted but anyway let's start...
So in Fourier series, for coefficients, we have by definition:
$c_k := \int_{<T>} x(\tau)\cdot e^{-j \frac{2\pi}{T} k \tau} d\tau$
where $c_k$ is the k-th coefficient of the Fourier series expansion, $T$ is the period of signal $x(t)$, and $<T>$ means that the integral is over one arbitrary period of signal $x(t)$. And by definition we have:
$x(t) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} c_k \cdot e^{j \frac{2\pi}{T} kt}$
First we should show that if the signal is real-valued, $c_k = c^*_{-k}$, where $*$ indicates complex conjugate of operand below itself.
For proof, using the definition of $c_k$ written above we can continue:
$c_{-k}^* = (\int_{<T>} x(\tau)\cdot e^{-j \frac{2\pi}{T} (-k) \tau} d\tau)^*$
then we apply the conjugate operator into parentheses, since $x(\tau)$ is real-valued, it doesn't change and the operand only affects $j$ in the exponent, then we can write:
$c_{-k}^* = \int_{<T>} {x(\tau)\cdot e^{j \frac{2\pi}{T} (-k) \tau} d\tau} = c_k \, \blacksquare \hspace{5mm} (1)$
Next we should show that the Fourier series coefficients for $x(-t)$, are $c_{-k}$, if $c_k$ are coefficients for $x(t)$.
Using the synthesis equation, we can write:
$x(-t) = \sum_{k'=-\infty}^{\infty} c_{k'} \cdot e^{j \frac{2\pi}{T} k'(-t)}$
Now if we substitute $k'$ by $-k$, we'll have:
$x(-t) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} c_{-k} \cdot e^{j \frac{2\pi}{T} kt}\hspace{5mm}(2)$
so we can conclude that the coefficients for $x(-t)$ are $c_{-k}$ given that coefficients for $x(t)$ are $c_{k}$.
For odd functions we know that $x(t) = -x(-t)$ and we can now, equate the k-th coefficients of both sides of the equation. Using relation (2) we have:
$c_k = -c_{-k}$
From (1) we have:
$c_k = c_{-k}^*$
Using above equations we can write:
$-c_{-k} = c_{-k}^*$
And now, considering complex numbers characteristics, we can conclude that $c_{-k}$ are imaginary numbers and so $c_k$, thus the phase angle for odd functions is $\pm90$.
For even functions similary we will have:
$c_{-k} = c_{-k}^*$
and we can conclude that $c_k$ are real so the phase angle should be 0 or 180. (180 is for negative coefficients)