I want to know precisely what $L^p$ represent really and physically. I know that $L^p$ norm of a function is an attempt to measure its width and height but what distinguish Lebesgue norms from $C^m$ norm for example or any other functional spaces norm?
2026-05-16 03:22:42.1778901762
Physical interpretation of Lebesgue norm $L^p$
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in FUNCTIONS
- Functions - confusion regarding properties, as per example in wiki
- Composition of functions - properties
- Finding Range from Domain
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Lower bound of bounded functions.
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-INTEGRAL
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- Square Integrable Functions are Measurable?
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- Solving an integral by using the Dominated Convergence Theorem.
- Convergence of a seqence under the integral sign
- If $g \in L^1$ and $f_n \to f$ a.e. where $|f_n| \leq 1$, then $g*f_n \to g*f$ uniformly on each compact set.
- Integral with Dirac measure.
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof that $x \mapsto \int |u(x+y)-u(y)|^p \lambda^n(dy)$ is continuous
- a) Compute $T(1_{[\alpha,\beta]})$ for all $0<\alpha <\beta<0$
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-MEASURE
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
- Is $L^p(\Omega)$ separable over Lebesgue measure.
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- uncountable families of measurable sets, in particular balls
- Joint CDF of $X, Y$ dependent on $X$
- Show that $ Tf $ is continuous and measurable on a Hilbert space $H=L_2((0,\infty))$
- True or False Question on Outer measure.
- Which of the following is an outer measure?
- Prove an assertion for a measure $\mu$ with $\mu (A+h)=\mu (A)$
Related Questions in NORMED-SPACES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Show that $\Phi$ is a contraction with a maximum norm.
- Understanding the essential range
- Mean value theorem for functions from $\mathbb R^n \to \mathbb R^n$
- Metric on a linear space is induced by norm if and only if the metric is homogeneous and translation invariant
- Gradient of integral of vector norm
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The $L^p$ norms are a way to measure the "energy" of a function. The most imporant ones to start with are the case where $p=1, p=2, p=\infty$.
In general, norms are ways of somehow measuring "length" of some element of a vector space.
for $p=1$, the definition is the area under $|f|$ must be finite. This can lead to some interesting cases.
Consider the Dirichlet function $D(x)$ which is $1$ on the rationals and $0$ at the irrationals. $||f||_{L^1([0,1])}=0$, so despite the fact this function is nowhere continuous, we still have a sense of how much "area" is under the graph. In this case $0$ because "most" of the points are $0$.
Intuitively, the $L^1$ norm measures now "spiky" a function is. The $L^{\infty}$ norm measures how "wide" a function is, and $L^2$ is in some sense an averaging of height and width, the $L^p$ spaces with $2<p<\infty$ are increasingly "biased" to how "wide" $f$ is.
How are the $L^p$ norms different from $C^m$ norms:
Lots of ways. A desirable property of function spaces is that the space be "complete" with respect to the norm. Complete normed spaces are so useful they have their own name: Banach Spaces, and are the main objects studied in functional analysis.
Functions which are $C^{\infty}$ (i.e. smooth) have derivatives of all orders, and in particular, are $m$ times differentiable. It turns out $C^{\infty}$ is not only a subset of $L^p$ but also dense in it (except for $p=\infty$). The $C^m$ spaces are finicky when it comes to completeness under various norms, so as a "main" function space, they have some problems. As such, it is better to consider them as dense subspaces of $L^p$.
Why is it useful to consider them as dense subspaces instead? Here are two key reasons:
$1$. Closed subspaces of complete metric spaces (normed spaces are always metric spaces by taking the metric to be $d(x,y)=||x-y||$) are also complete. Since $C^m$ is closed, it follows that it is complete under the $L^p$ norm.
Really what we are doing is all the nice properties of continuous functions as a collection of objects are better studied when they are viewed as a subspace of $L^p$.
$2$. In the modern theory of PDE, the function spaces being used are the Sobolev spaces $W^{k,p}$ where $k$ denotes the $k-th$ weak derivative and $p$ is the corresponding $L^p$ norm.
Ideally, when studying PDEs, we want strong solutions (solutions which are $C^{\infty}$), however this is wishful thinking, and in many cases, finding strong solutions is extremely difficult. As such, the concept of "weak derivative" was introduced. As expected, if a function has a strong derivative, it has a weak derivative. This allows to create a weak formulation for $PDE$ where the PDE has a solution if we consider weak derivatives rather than strong.
If we tried to use $C^m$ to study $PDEs$ we would not be able to find weak solutions for $PDEs$, which is a cornerstone of the modern theory. In addition, the Sobolev spaces $W^{k,p}$ take into account both the norm (often interpreted as energy, like I mentioned in the first sentence) and the weak derivative.
the $C^m$ spaces under various norms are very restritive compared to the Sobolev spaces in PDE, and even just regular $L^p$ spaces.
Conclusion
The $C^m$ spaces are significantly less useful to people who study PDEs, but even in analysis, many notions such as "almost everywhere" continuous or differentiable don't make sense in the $C^m$ spaces under any norm, even under norms which make $C^m$ complete. The Sobolev spaces allow you to measure the energy of a function and smoothness/differentiability properties in a more general setting by allowing notions of "weak" differentiability, which doesn't make sense without the notion of "almost everywhere."
Much more can be said, but I hope this gives some intuition!