An X-ray test is used to detect a disease that occurs, initially without any obvious symptoms, in 3% of the population. The test has the following error rates: 7% of people who are disease free have a positive result and 2% of the people who have the disease have a negative result. A large number of people are screened at random using the test, and those with a positive result are examined further. What proportion of people who have the disease are correctly tested?
2026-04-01 06:53:18.1775026398
Please help me with a step by step solution to this question.
1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in BAYES-THEOREM
- Question to calculating probability
- Bayes' Theorem, what am I doing wrong?
- A question about defective DVD players and conditional probabaility.
- Is my derivation for the maximum likelihood estimation for naive bayes correct?
- 1 Biased Coin and 1 Fair Coin, probability of 3rd Head given first 2 tosses are head?
- Conditional Probability/Bayes Theory question
- Dependence of posterior probability on parameters
- Probability Question on Bayes' Theorem
- Coin probability
- What is the probability of an event to happen in future based on the past events?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Note that when you say proportion of people who have the disease are correctly tested, I would assume that you are referring to "how many of the people who actually have the disease were correctly tested." In which case, the answer is 100% - 2% = 98%.
If you mean "how many of the people who were diagnosed as having the disease, who actually do have the disease", then consider the following:
97% of the population are disease free, and 3% have disease. Then, 7% of the 97% disease free people are mis-diagnosed (so their test result is positive). 98% of the 3% who have the disease are correctly diagnosed (test result is positive), so we have the following:
$$.07 * .97 = 0.0679$$ $$.98*.03 = 0.0294$$
You add these up to get the percentage of people who were diagnosed as having the disease. Then you find the fraction of the positively tested people who actually had the disease:
$$\frac{0.0294}{0.0679+0.0294} = \frac{0.0294}{0.0973} = 0.302158273381295 $$
This is approximately 30%. If this is not the answer you were looking for, please clarify the question. Hope this helps!