Hi can some one please explain why the conditional probability P(c/g^c) is 0.2. Shouldn't it be p(c)=0.2 where c is the event that a person has the characteristic?
2026-04-03 19:46:50.1775245610
Probability- Bayes Therorem?
55 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in BAYES-THEOREM
- Question to calculating probability
- Bayes' Theorem, what am I doing wrong?
- A question about defective DVD players and conditional probabaility.
- Is my derivation for the maximum likelihood estimation for naive bayes correct?
- 1 Biased Coin and 1 Fair Coin, probability of 3rd Head given first 2 tosses are head?
- Conditional Probability/Bayes Theory question
- Dependence of posterior probability on parameters
- Probability Question on Bayes' Theorem
- Coin probability
- What is the probability of an event to happen in future based on the past events?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No; not any person. Our $C$ is the event that the suspect has the characteristic. This is not representative of the general population; their selection was biased by the old evidence.
Should the suspect be actually the guilty party, then they would certainly have the characteristic of the guilty party. Thus $P(C\mid G)=1.00$
Should the suspect actually be innocent, and so merely coincidentally fit the profile of the old evidence, then we may consider them to be a representative of the general population (for the new evidence). Thus $P(C\mid G^{\small\complement}) = 0.2$
$\mathbf{Edit:}$
The reason the word "may" is used here in the last line "when suspect is innocent..,then we may consider them to be a representative of general population is because of the fact that the actual guilty person also belongs to the general population who possess the characteristic.
Let $x$ be the total population. Then for calculating the probability that the suspect possess the characteristic when he is not guilty, the sample space would consists of number of innocent people which is equal to $x-1$ and the number of outcomes favourable to the event will be equal to $0.2x-1$ (=number of people who are not guilty but possess the characteristic, since the guilty one belongs to those $0.2x$ people).
$$P(C\mid G^{\small\complement})=\frac{P(C\cap G^{\small\complement})}{P(G^{\small\complement})} = \frac{N(C\cap G^{\small\complement})}{N(G^{\small\complement})}$$
$$=\frac{0.2x-1}{x-1}=\frac{0.2-\frac{1}{x}}{1-\frac{1}{x}} \approx 0.2$$ (since total population $x$ is very large $1\over x$ is neglected)