It's before we prove that 'Product of two compact sets is compact'. There are topological spaces $X$(which is compact), $Y$ and the product topology on $X \times Y$ is given by the subbase $U \times V$ where $U$ is open in $X$ and $V$ is open in $Y$. Pick an element $\bullet \in Y$. Let $S$ be an open cover of $X \times \{\bullet\}$. Then $\pi_1(S)$ is an open cover of $X$ so there is a finite subcover then pick one $A_n$ from $S$ corresponding to each $\pi_1(A_n)$ but I think it may not cover $X \times \{\bullet\}$. How to complete the proof? For example let $Y$ be a $T_1$ space and pick another element $\bullet\bullet \in Y$. There exists an open set $W$ containing $\bullet\bullet$ but not $\bullet$. Lets construct an open cover of $X \times \{\bullet\}$ $$S \cup \{B \times W \mid B \in \pi_1(S)\}$$ Now we can apply this open cover to upper proof, and when we are picking $A_n$ from $S \cup \{B \times W \mid B \in \pi_1(S)\}$ corresponding to each $\pi_1(A_n)$, we may pick all the sets from $\{B \times W \mid B \in \pi_1(S)\}$ so in fact it doesn't cover $X \times \{\bullet\}$. Am I misunderstanding something?
2026-03-25 09:39:48.1774431588
Product of a compact topological space and a singleton in another topological space is compact proof
165 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in COMPACTNESS
- Every nonempty perfect set in $\mathbb R^k$ is uncountable: Rudin's argument
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
- Is the distance between those compact sets equal to $0$?
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- Set of Positive Sequences that Sum to 1 is Compact under Product Topology?
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Proving the one-point compactification of a topological space is a topology
- Never Used Compact Closure...
- Continuity of the maximal element of a multi-valued function
- Consider the metric space of infinite sequences of 0s and 1s under this metric.
Related Questions in PRODUCT-SPACE
- Open Set in Product Space Takes a Certain Form
- Set of Positive Sequences that Sum to 1 is Compact under Product Topology?
- $ \prod_{j \in J} X_{j} $ is locally connected if, and only if, each $ X_{j} $ is locally connected ...
- Dense subspaces of $L^\infty(\Omega\times\Omega)$
- $\{0,1\}^{\mathbb{N}}$ homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$?
- Understanding product topology
- The topology generated by the metric is the product topology of discrete space {0,1}
- Show that $(X,d)$ is compact
- For a discrete topological space $X$, is Perm$(X)$ a topological group as a subspace of product topological space $X^X$?
- Uniform distribution Measure
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There are two possible interpretations of the sentence "Let $S$ be an open cover of $X \times \{\bullet\}$":
Let $S$ be a collection of open subsets of $X \times Y$ which cover $X \times \{\bullet\}$. In this case, you must be careful how you proceed, for the reason that you have observed.
Let $S$ be a collection of open subsets of $X \times \{\bullet\}$ which cover $X \times \{\bullet\}$, where $X \times \{\bullet\}$ is given the subspace topology of $X \times Y$. In this case, you can simply observe that $\pi_1: X \times \{\bullet\} \to X$ is a homeomorphism, and the proof you've described works perfectly.
In the case that you are using version 1, observe that the intersection of an open subset of $X \times Y$ with $X \times \{\bullet\}$ forms an open subset of $X \times \{\bullet\}$, which projects under $\pi_1$. onto an open subset of $X$.