I have been proving problems like this all day with ease, but this is is just puzzling to me. Where do I start? Also, a site with questions and answers to problems like these.
2026-03-26 17:54:03.1774547643
Proof for sets and functions.
51 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in ELEMENTARY-SET-THEORY
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Composition of functions - properties
- Existence of a denumerble partition.
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- Show that $\omega^2+1$ is a prime number.
- A Convention of Set Builder Notation
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- Problem with Cartesian product and dimension for beginners
- Proof that a pair is injective and surjective
- Value of infinite product
Related Questions in METRIC-SPACES
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Is the following set open/closed/compact in the metric space?
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
Related Questions in MULTISETS
- Expected "overlap" between permutations of a multiset
- Bijection between sets and multisets
- Optimal way to choose a "prediction" for a random variable
- Binary Entropy solving over uniform distributions
- Permutation of a multiset with restrictions on two characters.
- Simplification of a Finite Sum
- I am confused with braces inside braces. Please help me to figure out which are elements and which are sets in this set given in the picture .
- How many distinct subsets of the set $S=\{1,8,9,39,52,91\}$ have odd sums?
- Family over a set such that the union is the set
- Generating function for sequence $a_i={n+im-1 \choose im}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

You just have to go back to the definitions of the concepts.
We use that $f^{-1}(S)$ is the set of elements $x\in X$ such that $f(x)\in S$ and that $f(S)$ is the set of elements $y\in Y$ such that there exists an element $x\in S$ such that $f(x) = y$.
Assume that $y\in C\cap f(X)$, this means that $y\in f(X)$ which means there's an $x\in X$ such that $f(x) = y$. Now we have that $y\in C$ so $x\in f^{-1}(C)$. And since $x\in f^{-1}(C)$ it follows that $y=f(x) \in f(f^{-1}(C))$. From this we can conclude that $C\cap f(X)\subseteq f(f^{-1}(C))$.
Using the same kind of approach we assume $y\in f(f^{-1}(C))$ and therefore it exists an $x\in f^{-1}(C)$ such that $f(x) = y$, but since $x\in f^{-1}(C)$ we have that $y = f(x)\in C$. From this we conclude that $f(f^{-1}(C))\subseteq C$. Also quite directly from the definition we have that $f(f^{-1}(C))\subseteq f(X)$.
From this we can conclude the first equality.
The second claim is not correctly written. If we for example have $X=\{1\}$ and $Y=\{2\}$ and $f(1)=2$ and suppose $A=X$ we have that $f^{-1}(A)\emptyset$ since there's no $x\in X$ such that $f(x)\in A$ (since $f(x)=2\notin A$.
What's probably meant is that $A\subseteq f^{-1}(f(A))$ (because $A$ is part of the range and that's what $f^{-1}(S)$ is). Now it should be provable using the same techniques...