The convolution theorem for Laplace transform states that $$\mathcal{L}\{f*g\}=\mathcal{L}\{f\}\cdot\mathcal{L}\{g\}.$$ The standard proof uses Fubini-like argument of switching the order of integration: $$\int_0^\infty d\tau \int_{\tau}^\infty e^{-st}f(t-\tau)g(\tau)\,dt=\int_0^\infty dt\int_0^te^{-st}f(t-\tau)g(\tau)\,d\tau$$ Fubini's theorem says that one can switch the order of integration. But what we have in the iterated integrals are not integrals, but limits of integrals (i.e., improper integrals). Are we justified to treat them like "proper" integrals and switch their order?
2025-03-14 14:14:20.1741961660
Proof of convolution theorem for Laplace transform
20.2k Views Asked by ashpool https://math.techqa.club/user/ashpool/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INTEGRATION
- Integrating using Green's Theorem
- Finding the value of a constant given a probability density function
- How to show that $\int_{\delta D} x\ dx $ is area of $D$
- How to find probability after finding the CDF of a max?
- Convergence of difference of series
- Why is it legal to take the antiderivative of both sides of an equation?
- question over a integration changes order and hard to compute
- Estimate of a (integral) function
- Using the chain rule of differentiation to evaluate an integral along a curve
- Name of multidimensional propagator integral
Related Questions in IMPROPER-INTEGRALS
- Name of multidimensional propagator integral
- integrating $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\!\frac{e^{\frac{1}{2}(t+2\sqrt{t}x-x^2)}}{\sqrt{2\pi}(1+(e^{\frac{t}{2}+\sqrt{t}x}-1)q)}\,\mathrm{d}x$
- Convergence of the improper integral $\int _{1}^{\infty}{\frac{x}{1-e^{x}}dx}$
- Improper Integral equal to another
- Does this integral involving Bessel functions converge? or diverge?
- Determining for which positive values of $p$ the improper integral $\int_1^{\infty}\frac{dx}{e^{px} \ln{x}}$ converges
- Does $\int_1^{+\infty} \frac{1}{\ln^2(x+1)}dx$ convergent?
- How to solve this integral with limits?
- Any possible ideas that will help me solve this integral
- Does $\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{2xdx}{x^2+1}$ converge?
Related Questions in LAPLACE-TRANSFORM
- Minimum number of zeros of this Laplace transform
- Inverse Laplace transform of $\frac{r_1e^{-t_0s}}{s + r_2 + r_3}$
- Solving a pair of kinetic equations using the Laplace transform
- Application of Laplace transform to stopping times and expectations
- laplace transform of smirnov density, i.e. how to calculate this integral?
- Inversion of Laplace transforms - simplifying the Bromwich integral
- Unilateral and bilateral Laplace transorm
- Inverse Laplace Transfrom of $s^{-1}e^{-a\sqrt{s} + b/s}$
- Laplace Transformation with initial value problem
- Laplace transform for convolution integral
Related Questions in CONVOLUTION
- Fourier transform to determine stability of fixpoint of equation with temporal convolution
- Inverse Laplace Transfrom of $s^{-1}e^{-a\sqrt{s} + b/s}$
- Approximating two-dimensional convolution
- Is there a mistake in my calculations?
- Convolution and differential equations
- Convolution of two Uniform random variables
- How to calculate the cross-correlation of a halfwave?
- Binomial Convolution
- Find the PDF of X1 +X2 +X3.
- energy of a convolution
Related Questions in FUBINI-TONELLI-THEOREMS
- Is the following in $L^2$?
- Proof of convolution theorem for Laplace transform
- Reading and Evaluating an Iterated Integral
- A converse version of Fubini's Theorem
- Calculate the Integral of $\int \frac{1}{x+y}d\lambda_2(x,y)$ on $[0,1]^2$
- Fourier Transform of Euclidean Norm
- Integration and Tonelli's Theorem
- proving that the function $f(x) = \lambda(S ∩ (S + x))$ is a continuous and $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x) = 0$
- Having Trouble Using Fubini's Theorem
- $\left( k, n \right)$ symmetry?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
\begin{align*}\mathcal{L}\{f\}({s})\cdot\mathcal{L}\{g\}({s})&=\left(\int_0^\infty e^{-{s}t}{f}(t)\,dt\right)\left(\int_0^\infty e^{-{s}u}{g}(u)\,du\right)\\ &=\lim_{{{L}}\to\infty}\left(\int_0^{{L}}e^{-{s}t}{f}(t)\,dt\right)\left(\int_0^{{L}}e^{-{s}u}{g}(u)\,du\right) \end{align*} By Fubini's theorem, \begin{align*}\left(\int_0^{{L}}e^{-{s}t}{f}(t)\,dt\right)\left(\int_0^{{L}}e^{-{s}u}{g}(u)\,du\right)&=\int_0^{{L}}\int_0^{{L}}e^{-{s}(t+u)}{f}(t){g}(u)\,dt\,du\\ &=\iint_{R_{{L}}}e^{-{s}(t+u)}{f}(t){g}(u)\,dt\,du, \end{align*} where $R_{{L}}$ is the square region $$0\leq t\leq {{L}},\qquad 0\leq u\leq {{L}}.$$ Let $T_{{L}}$ be the triangular region $$0\leq t\leq {{L}},\qquad 0\leq u\leq {{L}},\qquad t+u\leq {{L}}.$$ Provided that ${f}$ and ${g}$ are bounded by exponential functions, $$\lim_{{{L}}\to\infty}\iint_{R_{{L}}}e^{-{s}(t+u)}{f}(t){g}(u)\,dt\,du=\lim_{{{L}}\to\infty}\iint_{T_{{L}}}e^{-{s}(t+u)}{f}(t){g}(u)\,dt\,du.$$ Now, the function $$\varphi(v,u)=(v-u,u)$$ maps $D_{{L}}$ bijectively onto $T_{{L}}$, where $D_{{L}}$ is the triangular region $$0\leq v\leq {{L}},\qquad 0\leq u\leq {{L}},\qquad v\geq u.$$
The component functions of $\varphi$ are
$$t(v,u)=v-u\qquad\mbox{and}\qquad u(v,u)=u,$$
so the Jacobian of $\varphi$ is
$$J\varphi=\det\begin{bmatrix}t_v&t_u\\u_v&u_u\end{bmatrix}=\det\begin{bmatrix}1&-1\\0&1\end{bmatrix}=1.$$
Hence,
$$\iint_{T_{{L}}}e^{-{s}(t+u)}{f}(t){g}(u)\,dt\,du=\iint_{D_{{L}}}e^{-{s}v}{f}(v-u){g}(u)\,dv\,du.$$
By Fubini's theorem,
\begin{align*}&\iint_{D_{{L}}}e^{-{s}v}{f}(v-u){g}(u)\,dv\,du=\int_0^{{L}}\int_0^ve^{-{s}v}{f}(v-u){g}(u)\,du\,dv\\
\\
&=\int_0^{{L}}e^{-{s}v}\int_0^v{f}(v-u){g}(u)\,du\,dv=\int_0^{{L}}e^{-{s}v}({f}\ast{g})(v)\,dv.
\end{align*}
Hence,
\begin{align*}\lim_{{{L}}\to\infty}\iint_{D_{{L}}}e^{-{s}v}{f}(v-u){g}(u)\,dv\,du&=\lim_{{{L}}\to\infty}\int_0^{{L}}e^{-{s}v}({f}\ast{g})(v)\,dv\\
\\
&=\int_0^\infty e^{-{s}v}({f}\ast{g})(v)\,dv\\
\\
&=\mathcal{L}\{{f}\ast{g}\}({s}).
\end{align*}