Let $f_J: [0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, for $J = 1,2,3,\ldots$. That converges to a function, $f$. For J = 1, define $f_1(t) = t$. For $J > 1$, define a piecewise linear function, $$f_{J+1} = \begin{cases} f_J(t) \quad \forall t \in X_{J} \\ f_J(t) + (-1)^{k+J}2^{\frac{-1}{2}(J+2)} \quad \forall t = (2k-1)2^{-(J+1)} \quad k = 1, \ldots, 2^{J} \end{cases}$$ where $X_{J} =\{0,2^{-J},2\times 2^{-J}, 3\times 2^{-J}, \ldots , 1\}$.
Consider a point $t = k2^{-J}$ for some $J > 0$ and $0 \leq k < 2^{J}$. Show that for any such point, $$|f_{J'}(t + 2^{-J'}) - f_{J'}(t)| \geq \frac{2^{-J'/2}}{8}$$ for some $J' \in \{J+1, J+2\}$
I think we'll ease the problem introducing a few notations.
$X_j=\{0,\frac{1}{2^j},\frac{2}{2^j},\frac{3}{2^j},...,1\}$
$Y_{j+1}=\{\frac{1}{2^{j+1}},\frac{3}{2^{j+1}},\frac{5}{2^{j+1}},...,\frac{2^{j+1}-1}{2^{j+1}}\}=X_{j+1}-X_j$
Let's define points in $X_j$ : $X_j(k)=\frac{k}{2^j}$ for $k=0\,..\,2^j$
Let's define points in $Y_j$ : $Y_{j+1}(k)=\frac{2k+1}{2^{j+1}}$ for $k=0\,..\,2^j-1$. (easier with 2k+1 than 2k-1).
First let's notice that $Y_{j+1}$ points are interlaced with $X_j$ points:
$X_j(k)<Y_{j+1}(k)=\frac{X_j(k)+X_j(k+1)}{2}<X_j(k+1)$
So $t\in Y_{j+1}\Rightarrow f_j(t)=f_j(Y_{j+1}(k))=\frac{f_j(X_j(k))+f_j(X_j(k+1))}{2}\quad$ since $f_j$ is linear in this interval.
And also since both $X_j$ and $Y_{j+1}$ are subsets of $X_{j+1}$ we have $\begin{cases} X_{j}(k)=X_{j+1}(2k)\\ Y_{j+1}(k)=X_{j+1}(2k+1)\\ \end{cases}$
We now have a more precise definition of $f_{j+1}$ :
$\left\{\begin{array}{lll} t\in X_j & t=X_j(k),\ k=0\,..\,2^j & f_{j+1}(t)=f_j(X_j(k)) \\ t\in Y_{j+1} & t=Y_{j+1}(k),\ k=0\,..\,2^j-1 & f_{j+1}(t)=\frac{f_j(X_j(k))+f_j(X_j(k+1))}{2}+\frac{(-1)^{k+1+j}}{2^\frac{j+2}{2}} \\ \end{array}\right.$
Now considering your question regarding $A(J)=f_J(t+2^{-J})-f_J(t)$ for $t=2^{-j}k$.
$t=2^{-j}k=X_j(k)$ for $k\neq2^j$ or $t\neq1$
For $J=j+1$ we have $t+2^{-J}=\frac{k}{2^j}+\frac{1}{2^{j+1}}=\frac{2k+1}{2^{j+1}}=Y_{j+1}(k)$
For $J=j+2$ we have $t+2^{-J}=\frac{k}{2^j}+\frac{1}{2^{j+2}}=\frac{2(2k)+1}{2^{j+2}}=Y_{j+2}(2k)$
$A(j+1)=f_{j+1}(Y_{j+1}(k))-f_{j+1}(X_j(k))=\frac{f_j(X_j(k+1))-f_j(X_j(k))}{2}+\frac{(-1)^{k+1+j}}{2^\frac{j+2}{2}}$
$A(j+2)=f_{j+2}(Y_{j+2}(2k))-f_{j+2}(X_j(k))=\frac{f_{j+1}(X_{j+1}(2k+1))+f_{j+1}(X_{j+1}(2k))}{2}+\frac{(-1)^{k+2+j}}{2^\frac{j+3}{2}}-f_j(X_j(k))=\frac{f_{j+1}(Y_{j+1}(k))+f_j(X_j(k))}{2}+...=\frac{f_j(X_j(k+1))-f_j(X_j(k))}{4}+\frac12\frac{(-1)^{k+1+j}}{2^\frac{j+2}{2}}+\frac{(-1)^{k+2+j}}{2^\frac{j+3}{2}}$
So we see that what's interest us is evaluating the difference of the values of $f_j$ taken in two consecutive points of $X_j$.
We have also that $2A(j+2)-A(j+1)=\frac{(-1)^{k+j}}{2^\frac{j+1}{2}}$ for $j\ge0$.
Let's call $a_n=(\sqrt 2)^nA(n)\ $ for $n\ge 1$
$(\sqrt 2)^{n+1}(2A(n+2)-A(n+1))=\sqrt 2\,a_{n+2}-a_{n+1}=(-1)^{k+n}$ $=-(-1)^{k+n-1}=-(\sqrt 2\,a_{n+1}-a_{n})$
And we get the double recurrence relation : $(\sqrt 2)a_{n+2}+(\sqrt 2-1)a_{n+1}+a_n=0$.
But $\Delta=(\sqrt 2-1)^2-4\sqrt 2=-(6\sqrt 2-3)<0$ is not so nice...
$|A(J)|\ge \frac{2^{-J/2}}{8}\iff |8a_J|\ge1$ for some $J$.
I'm stuck there too. It's a pity because this idea seemed promising, theoretically $a_n$ is completely determined by the recurrence, but practically the bad $\Delta$ ruins every chance to extract some practical stuff about $a_n$.
It seems, we are good for actually finding an explicit expression for $f_j(X_j(k))$.
To be continued...
Here is the function $f_7$, it looks like a nice fractal bumpy thing.
I was tired of making no progress, so since the values are in $\mathbb Q[\sqrt 2]=\{\frac{a+b\sqrt 2}{c}\ |\ (a,b,c)\in\mathbb Z^3\}$, I programmed arithmetic operations in this field, and let my computer calculate the values of $f_j$. Please find below a link to download the results.
Computed values of $f_j(X_j(k))$ : text zipped file
$DIFF=f_j(X_j(k+1)-f_j(X_j(k))\simeq A(j)$
As you can notice
DIFF_MAXseems to behave nicely and the ratio with $\frac{2^-(j/2)}{8}$ seems to converge to some fixed positive value.Yet your question was about
DIFF_MIN, and this time it is not ok at all, the ratio clearly decrease to $0$ and faster than expected.Rem: this cannot seem to be fixable easily, because even if I take the ratio with $2^{-j}/8$ instead of $2^{-j/2}/8$ this is still decreasing to $0$ (not showed here, but I've made the test for myself).
The good ratio appears to be $\bbox[5px,border:2px solid red]{2^{-3(j+1)/2}}$ It holds till $j=25$, but I cannot test it beyond because of memory limitations.
So I think there is a mistake in your minoration statement!