Is my proof of the following excersize sufficient? I am given two relations and i am supposed to show whether they are reflexive, transitive and symmetric.
Given $ R\subseteq\mathbb Z \times\mathbb Z $
- $xRy \iff x= \sqrt{y^2} $
reflexivity: i) show a counter example that if $ x = -5 $ it follows $ -5 \neq 5 $ Thus R is not Reflexive.
symetric property: Here i am not sure if this is a proof or not, my idea is that, it follows from the observation that only non negative numbers are in relation and only with itself. Therefore,
$\implies $ $x = \sqrt{y^2} $ $\implies $ $y = \sqrt{x^2} $ and thus the relation R is symmetric.
transitivity: From the definition of transitivity of a relation, if $ $ $x = \sqrt{y^2} $ $\land$ $ $$ y = \sqrt{z^2}$ $\implies $ $x = \sqrt{z^2} $ Again, we observed how the relation looks like, so when we choose $z=y=x$ the relation is Transitive.
Given $ S\subseteq ℚ \times ℚ $
- $xSy \iff \exists z $$\;\in$$\; ℚ $: $x\le z\le y$
reflexivity: My observation is that we can not find a $z:\ $z $ \neq$ 3 $\ $between for example $3\le z\le 3$ thus S is not reflexive.
symetric property: In order for S to be symmetric we need $x\le z\le y$ $\implies$ $y\le z\le x$ I show a counter example: $xSy$ for $(x,y) = (3,5)$ and $z=4$, but $ySx$ does not hold. therefore not symmetric.
transitivity: $x\le z\le y \quad \land \quad y\le z\le w$ $\implies$ $x\le z\le w$ if we choose $y=z$ it holds, so S is transitive.
Is this a valid solution?
Concerning $R\subset\mathbb Z\times\mathbb Z$. I would rewrite the relation by $xRy\iff x=|y|$.
Concerning $S\subset\mathbb Q\times\mathbb Q$.