Proposed proof for:$b! \equiv 0 \pmod a$ $\Rightarrow$ $a \le b$

55 Views Asked by At

Let a,b $\in$ $\mathbb{Z}$. Obviously, a counterexample can disprove this statement.
I tried this approach to seek another method (possibly proof by contradiction):

$a|b!$
$a|[b(b-1)!]$

If $gcd(a,(b-1)!)=1$, then $a|b$ and hence: $a \le b$.
But I think claiming that $a|b$ is too restrictive because $a$ can be less than $b$ without having $a|b$ necessarily.


I tried to study two cases to reach a contradiction that $gcd(a,(b-1)!)\not=1$, yet I couldn't figure out how to continue so this might actually help out :
1) $a=b$
2) $a \lt b$


Is there any mistake that I have done? Is this proof inconclusive or are there any improvements to be made so that it is a valid proof?
Thank you in advance
EDIT: Counterexamples most certainly get the job done here. Though, I am seeking another method to disprove the statement.
EDIT 2: The original proposition is: $$a \le b \Rightarrow b! \equiv 0 \pmod a$$
I am trying to justify whether the converse of this statement is right or wrong, which is obviously wrong using counterexamples. The purpose is to find another method to disprove the converse.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

5
On BEST ANSWER

I think there's no point to try and prove a false statement. Because $15|5!$ for example.

What is a true version of this statement is $$a|b! \implies \text{prime factors of }a \le b$$ You can try and prove this!

Update: I understood you seek to prove it without using counterexamples, so let's try:

Let $p$ and $q$ be prime numbers where $p > q$, we have $pq|p!$ while $pq >p$

Another update: in your solution of "disproving the statement" you suggested that $\gcd(a,(b-1)!)=1$ while $a \le b$. Well if $a<b$ we have $a|(b-1)!$ so this directly means $a=b$ and this is something you wouldn't want as a step in disproving the statement. So the thing you'd first try is finding $a>b$ and $a|b!$, and I've given that in my first update.

0
On

$b = 5$ and $a = 6$ is a counterexample.

The statement is true, however, if $a$ is further assumed to be prime.

Note that $b!$ has as factors, all natural numbers $\le b$. If $a$ is prime and $a > b$, then $a$ cannot divide $b!$ since $a$ is a prime factor of $a$ that won't divide $b!$.

If $a$ is not prime, then it is possible for all of its prime factors (with appropriate multiplicities) to be factors of $b!$ even if $b < a$, as shown above.