I am having trouble in formally proving this statement. I looked online and most proofs just mention that it is the part of the definition of c.e (computably enumerable) language.
2026-02-23 01:25:08.1771809908
Prove that a language A is c.e. iff it is the range of a partially computable function
698 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONS
- Functions - confusion regarding properties, as per example in wiki
- Composition of functions - properties
- Finding Range from Domain
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Lower bound of bounded functions.
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in COMPUTABILITY
- Are all infinite sets of indices of computable functions extensional?
- Simple applications of forcing in recursion theory?
- Proof of "Extension" for Rice's Theorem
- How to interpret Matiyasevich–Robinson–Davis–Putnam in term of algebraic geometry or geometry?
- Does there exist a weakly increasing cofinal function $\kappa \to \kappa$ strictly below the diagonal?
- Why isn't the idea of "an oracle for the halting problem" considered self-contradictory?
- is there any set membership of which is not decidable in polynomial time but semidecidable in P?
- The elementary theory of finite commutative rings
- Is there any universal algorithm converting grammar to Turing Machine?
- Is the sign of a real number decidable?
Related Questions in PARTIAL-FUNCTIONS
- How do I show that this relation is a partial function?
- In what way is a partial function different from a partial transformation when both can always express the other's associated total function?
- The average values of a harmonic function over the ball and surface of the ball are the same?
- Prove that a language A is c.e. iff it is the range of a partially computable function
- Anything special on the ratio of partial over total functions?
- Definition of (lazy) conditional in partial recursive functions
- Directional Derivative with partial function
- What equivalence relation is being used to define the category of partial maps?
- The logic behind adding this sentence to the second condition in this definition of isomorphism
- Can I give undefined ($\perp$) as an argument to my function?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm going to assume that you're using as your definition of a set being computably enumerable that there is a computable procedure for listing the elements of the set. In this case, the direction $A$ is computably enumerable implies that $A$ is the range of a partial computable function is pretty easy: just define a function $f$ by $f(n)=$ the $n^{th}$ element in the listing of the elements of $A$. Then $f$ is in fact total computable, since to compute $f(n)$ for any $n$ you just run the computable procedure to list the elements of $A$ until $n$ elements have been listed and then just output the $n^{th}$ one.
In the other direction, if $A$ is the range of some partial computable function $f$, then you need to come up with a computable procedure for listing the values of $f(n)$ for all $n$ such that $f(n)$ halts. So e.g. your procedure could start by running the computation $f(0)$ for 1 step, then running $f(0)$ and $f(1)$ both for 2 steps, and so forth, and whenever any of the computations halt outputting the value you get. In this way, you'll eventually list all of the values in the range of $f$, hence all of the elements of $A$.