In the following proof we harness properties such as: For all set $A$,
(i) $A = A - \varnothing$
(ii) $A \cap\varnothing=\varnothing$
Proof:
Let $A$ and $B$ be arbitrary sets and suppose $( A \cup B ) - B = A$.
Given (i) then $$( A \cup B ) - B = A - \varnothing.$$
So then, $( A \cup B ) = A$ and $B = \varnothing$.
That being so, $$A \cap B = ( A \cup B ) \cap \varnothing = \varnothing$$
If we apply (ii) to the foregoing equivalence relation. Therefore $$A \cap B = \varnothing$$
Is this proof right? if it is I would like to see alternative ones.
Suppose that $x \in A \cap B$ existed. Then $x \in A$ but also $x \in A \cup B$ and $x \in B$ so that $x \notin (A \cup B) - B$. This contradicts the starting assumption that $A=(A\cup B)-B$, so $A \cap B = \emptyset$.