For arbitrary $x$ and $1\leqslant m\leqslant n$, prove the following:
$$\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{\prod_{1\leq r\leq n, r\neq m}(x+k-r)}{\prod_{1\leq r\leq n, r\neq k}(k-r)}=1$$
I'm looking for a proof that does not involve the more general identity:
$$\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{\prod_{1\leqslant r\leqslant n-1}(y_k-z_r)}{\prod_{1\leqslant r\leqslant n, r\neq k}(y_k-y_r)}=1$$
I assume that the elementary proof I am looking for is based on getting the terms to their common denominator will somehow result in mass cancellation, but I am not really sure on how to get to it. Perhaps there is a less known formula. I don't really know because I didn't find too much books about the summation.
Note: The $m$ not being present anywhere except the condition of the product in the numerator is not a mistake. It intentionally excludes $m$-th term from each product in the numerator exactly to make things work.
Here is an elementary proof for the special case $m=1$.
We write the denominator of (1) as \begin{align*} \left(\prod_{{r=1}\atop{r\ne k}}^{n}(k-r)\right)^{-1} &=\left(\prod_{r=1}^{k-1}(k-r)\prod_{r=k+1}^n(k-r)\right)^{-1}\\ &=\frac{1}{(k-1)!}\,\frac{(-1)^{n-k}}{(n-k)!}\\ &=\frac{(-1)^{n-k}k}{n!}\binom{n}{k}\tag{2} \end{align*}
where we use the falling factorial notation $x^{\underline{n}}=x(x-1)\cdots(x-n+1)$. Since the claim (3.1) is independent of $x$ we consider in (3.2) a shifted variant: $x\to x+2$ to have a somewhat simpler starting point.
Comment:
In (4.1) we separate the summand with $k=n+1$ and use the binomial identity $\binom{n+1}{k}=\binom{n}{k}+\binom{n}{k-1}$.
In (4.2) we multiply out and shift the index of the right-hand sum by one to start with $k=0$.
In (4.3) we collect equal terms and simplify in (4.4).
In (4.5) we observe the left-hand sum is $(n+1)P_n(x)$ and the right-hand sum is $0$ which is shown for example in this post.