Prove that $v \in T_mSL(n) \iff \text{tr } v = 0$.

412 Views Asked by At

Prove that $v \in T_mSL(n) \iff \text{tr } v = 0$.

I haven't idea how to prove that. I understand next steps:

  1. $SL(n)$ - are the matrices $n\times n$ that have $\det = 1$

  2. $T_mSL(n) = {W_m(SL(n))}/{\underset{m}{\sim}}$

Where $W_m(SL(n)) = \{\gamma \in C^{\infty}((\alpha,\beta), SL(n))\ |\ \gamma(0) = m, 0 \in (\alpha,\beta) \subset \mathbb{R}\}$

And $\gamma_1 \underset{m}{\sim} \gamma_2 \iff\exists$ coordinates $\xi$ that $(\xi \circ \gamma_1)'(0) = (\xi \circ \gamma_2)'(0)$

Next i can't understand how to do tasks like this

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

Straight approach. Direct computation from the definition.

By definition, one has: $$\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})={\det}^{-1}(\{1\}).$$ Furthermore, for all $X\in\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})$, $M\mapsto XM$ is a diffeomorphism of $\mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{R})$, hence it suffices to show that $\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})$ is a manifold in a neighbourhood of $I_n$ and one will have: $$T_X\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})=XT_{I_n}\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R}).$$ Let us show that $\det\colon\mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{R})\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ is a submersion at $I_n$. It is a well-known result that: $$\mathrm{d}_{I_n}\det\cdot H=\textrm{tr}(H)\tag{1}.$$ Hence, $\mathrm{d}_{I_n}\det$ is a submersion since it is a nonzero linear map with codomain of dimension $1$, $\textrm{tr}(I_n)=n$. Finally, $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})$ is a manifold of dimension $n^2-1$ and one has: $$T_X\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})=X\ker(\mathrm{d}_{I_n}\det)=\{M\in\mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{R})\textrm{ s.t. }\textrm{tr}(X^{-1}H)=0\}.$$

If you do not recall how to establish $(1)$ here is a sketch of a proof. For all $(i,j)\in\{1,\ldots,n\}^2$, let $E_{i,j}$ be the matrix with zero entries everywhere except the entry $(i,j)$ which is a $1$. Then, notice that: $$\frac{\partial\det}{\partial E_{i,j}}(I_n):=\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{\det(I_n+tE_{i,j})-1}{t}=\delta_{i,j}.$$ Indeed, if $i\neq j$, then $\det(I_n+tE_{i,j})=1$ and $\det(I_n+tE_{i,i})=1+t$. Finally, one has: $$\mathrm{d}_{I_n}\det\cdot H=\sum_{i=1}^n\sum_{j=1}^nh_{i,j}\frac{\partial\det}{\partial E_{i,j}}(I_n)=\sum_{i=1}^nh_{i,i}=\textrm{tr}(H).$$


Addendum. Submersions and tangent spaces.

I am going to expand a bit on the link between the tangent space and the kernel of the differential of a submersion, maybe it will shed some light.

Let $M$ be a manifold of dimension $n$, let $v$ be a point of $M$ and let $(U,\Phi)$ be a chart of $M$ centered at $v$. The map $\ell\colon T_vM\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^n$ defined by: $$\ell([c])=(\Phi\circ c)'(0),$$ where $[c]$ denotes the tangency class of a curve $c\colon]-\varepsilon,\varepsilon[\rightarrow M$ going through $v$, is well-defined, namely the value $\ell([c])$ only depends of the tangency class of $c$ and is bijective. Indeed, it is injective by definition of the tangency relation and is surjective. If $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$, then $t\mapsto\Phi^{-1}(tx)$ is a curve of $M$ going through $v$ such that: $$\ell([c])=x.$$ Therefore, one can endow $T_vM$ with a structure of a $n$-dimensional vector space.

Now, let $f\colon X\rightarrow Y$ be a submersion at $v$, with $M\subseteq X$ and $n=\dim(X)-\dim(Y)$ such that: $$M=f^{-1}(\{y\})$$ Now, notice that if $c\colon]-\varepsilon,\varepsilon[\rightarrow M$ is a curve going through $v$, then: $$f\circ c=y.$$ In particular, one has $\Phi\circ f\circ c=\Phi(y)$ and by differentiation, one gets: $$\mathrm{d}_vf([c]):=(\Phi\circ f\circ c)'(0)=0.$$ namely $[c]\in\ker(\mathrm{d}_vf)$. Finally, we have establish that: $$\ker(\mathrm{d}_vf)\subseteq T_vM.$$ Whence $T_vM=\ker(\mathrm{d}_vf)$, using the equality of dimension between the two vector spaces.


Another approach. The Cartan-Von Neumann theorem.

If you want to involve some machinery, you can always use the following:

Theorem. Let $G$ be a closed subgroup of $\textrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})$, then $G$ is a manifold whose tangent space at $I_n$ is: $$\mathfrak{g}:=\{X\in\mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{R})\textrm{ s.t. }\forall t\in\mathbb{R},\exp(tX)\in G\}.$$

This is not a too hard result, the key point is observing that $\mathfrak{g}$ is a vector space which follows from $G$ being closed and the Lie-Trotter formula.

In our case, $\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})$ is indeed a closed subgroup of $\textrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})$, therefore: $$T_{I_n}\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})=\{X\in\mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{R})\textrm{ s.t. }\forall t\in\mathbb{R},\det(\exp(tX))=1\}.$$ Using trigonalization over $\mathbb{C}$, one has: $$\det\circ\exp=\exp\circ\textrm{tr}.$$ Finally, one gets: $$\begin{align}T_{I_n}\textrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})&=\{X\in\mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{R})\textrm{ s.t. }\forall t\in\mathbb{R},\exp(t\textrm{tr}(X))=1\}\\&=\{X\in\mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{R})\textrm{ s.t. }\textrm{tr}(X)=0\}.\end{align}$$