prove (?) the trichotomy property

212 Views Asked by At

Let $(X, \preceq)$ be a total ordered set, show that

$$ x \prec y \leftrightarrow x \preceq y \land x \neq y$$ is a transitive relation, such that for each $x$, $y$ $\in X$ exactly one case holds: 1) $x \prec y$ 2) $x=y$ 3) $y \prec x$

I am really unsure here, doesn't the transitivity and trichotomy follow from X being total ordered? Is this https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Trichotomy_Law_(Ordering) the proof needed here?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

6
On BEST ANSWER

They do follow from the fact that $\preceq$ is a total ordering, but there’s a bit of work to be done in order to show that they do.

You’re being asked to show two things. The first is that $\prec$ is transitive, i.e., that if $x,y,z\in X$ and $x\prec y\prec z$, then $x\prec z$. That $x\preceq z$ is immediate from the transitivity of $\preceq$, but you still have to show that $x\ne z$, which isn’t quite trivial.

The second is that for each $x,y\in X$, exactly one of $x\prec y$, $x=y$, and $y\prec x$ holds. You know that either $x\preceq y$ or $y\preceq x$. If $x\preceq y$, then either $x\ne y$, in which case $x\prec y$ by definition, and it’s easy to verify that $y\not\prec x$, or $x=y$, in which case by definition $x\not\prec y$ and $y\not\prec x$. Finishing it off is just more of the same sort of reasoning.

1
On

Show $\forall x,y$($x\preceq y\lor y\prec x)$ : Suppose not, i.e. $\exists x,y(x\npreceq y\land y\nprec x)$. From $y\nprec x$, $y\npreceq x\lor y=x$ (definition). If $y=x$ holds, then $x\preceq y$, which contradicts the assumption $x\npreceq y$. Therefore $y\npreceq x$ holds, however, again this contradicts that $(X,\preceq)$ is total ordered set. Therefore $\forall x,y$($x\preceq y\lor y\prec x)$ holds, which states at least one of 1),2) and 3) holds.

Now show only one of 1),2) and 3) holds for given $x,y\in X$ : Suppose not. If 1) and 2) holds in same time, then $x\preceq y\land x\neq y\land x=y$, which clearly a contradiction. The case for 2) and 3) can be seen similarly. If 1) and 3) holds in same time, then $x\preceq y\land y\preceq x\land x\neq y\Rightarrow x=y\land x\neq y$, a contradiction. Therefore for given $x,y\in X$, only one of 1),2), and 3) holds.